-
Supreme Court: Split Verdict Passed In Hijab Case; Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia Sets Aside Karnataka HC Judgement
-
Delhi High Court: Income Tax On Interest Income From FD, Ownership Need To Be Determined By Arbitral Tribunal
-
Supreme Court: Order VIII Rule 6A CPC – No Bar In Taking On Record A Counter Claim Filed Long After Filing Of Written Statement But Before Framing Of Issues
-
CESTAT: Allegations Of Clandestine Removal Of Goods Merely Based On Entries In Diaries Not Sustainable
-
On October 14, the Supreme Court will hear a case involving electoral bonds
-
Supreme Court: No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act If Cheque Is Presented For Full Amount Without Endorsing Part Payment Made By Borrower
-
Supreme Court: Writ Of Quo Warranto Can Be Issued Where An Appointment Has Not Been Made In Accordance With Law
-
High Court Directs Delhi Govt: Create OTP-based System For Processing Payment Of Professional Fees To Standing Counsels
-
Supreme Court: Asks Centre For Filling Its Response To Pleas Challenging Places Of Worship Act By October 31
-
Delhi court frames charges against wrestler Sushil Kumar, 17 others in murder case
-
Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Sushil Ansal’s Plea Against Conviction In Evidence Tampering Case: Uphaar Fire Today
-
CJI UU Lalit Recommended Justice DY Chandrachud As The Next Chief Justice Of India
-
Punjab & Haryana High Court: Court Should Secure Personal Liberty Of An Under Trial Where Trial Is Delayed For No Fault On His Part
-
DSLSA To Delhi High Court: Preparing SOP For 81,902 POSCO Cases Where Victims Yet To Receive Compensation
-
Chief Justice UU Lalit recommends Justice Chandrachud as next CJI
-
Travel agent’s booking function is not substantial business activity and not taxable
-
Mandatary to show wife was living in adultery shortly before or after moving maintenance plea to disentitle her to relief
-
Supreme Court Collegium Releases Statement: Two Judges Objected To Procedure, September 30 Meeting Discharged
-
Punjab and Haryana High Court: “Motherhood in innate, forcing wife to terminate pregnancy against her will amounts to cruelty”
-
SC issues notice on plea to declare ‘Talaq-e-Kinaya’ , ‘Talaq-e-Bain’ void
-
Supreme Court will hear Satyendar Jain’s petition tomorrow for the ED to transfer the case to a new judge
-
Madras High Court: Case Quashed Against 13 Protestors Who Allegedly Raised Slogans Against National Education Policy 2020
-
Supreme Court: Refused To Entertain Challenge Against Bihar Cricket Association Election; Allows Petitioner To Avail Other Remedies
-
Bombay High Court To Maharashtra Govt: Consider Handing Over All Roads Within Greater Mumbai To BMC
-
Supreme Court: Chief Examination & Cross-Examination Of Witness Must Be Recorded On The Same Day Or Following Day
-
Seeking NIA’s response on plea seeking FIR copy in case against PFI members: Delhi High Court
-
Kiren Rijiju, Union Law Minister Writes To CJI UU Lalit Requesting Him To Recommend His Successor
-
Karnataka High Court: Employee Cannot Initiate Criminal Proceedings After Termination To Arm Twist Employer
-
Court denies bail to accused in Delhi riots larger conspiracy case: Attended ‘conspiratorial’ meetings, organized protest
-
Seeking Information From States/UTs On Old Age Homes In Each District, Pension For Elderly & Geriatric Care: Supreme Court
-
Centre proposes to submit before Supreme Court a model builder-buyer agreement with mandatory RERA clauses
-
Centre Appoints Delhi HC Judge Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma As Presiding Officer Of UAPA Tribunal: PFI Ban
-
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against EVM: ‘Party Without Recognition From Electorate Seeking Recognition By Filling Petitions’
-
NCLAT: Withdrawal Of Resolution Plan Will Have Disastrous Effect.
-
Supreme Court: Order Of Termination Approved By Industrial Tribunal Is Binding On Parties, Labour Court Can’t Take Contrary View.
-
‘Attempt To Threaten Judges With Contempt Pleas Unacceptable’ : Madhya Pradesh High Court
-
Supreme Court Sets HC Bail Condition Of Depositing Rs 7.5 Lakhs: Plea Seeking Pre-Arrest Bail Not Money Recovery Proceedings.
-
Delhi High Court: [CPC] Objective Of Interrogatories Is To Narrow Controversy, Can’t Be Used By Plaintiff For Substituting Burden Of Proof.
Advertisement
Advertisement