Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has come under intense scrutiny following his recent testimony at Canada’s foreign interference inquiry, where he admitted that his government possesses only intelligence, not concrete evidence, regarding claims that Indian agents were involved in the murder of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. This revelation has drawn ire not only from India but also from commentators in Canada.
Canadian journalist Daniel Bordman described Trudeau’s admission as a “major win” for the Indian narrative. He emphasized that Canada had escalated tensions by expelling diplomats and publicly naming the Indian High Commission in connection with the murder. Bordman noted the ongoing disagreement over whether Nijjar was a terrorist or a community activist, which has remained unresolved.
Political commentator Kirk Lubimov labeled Trudeau’s statement an “absolute disaster,” questioning the Prime Minister’s handling of the situation. He tweeted, “Did Justin Trudeau just say there is no evidence in regards to the India kerfuffle?… This ain’t good.” Others, like journalist Sameer Kaushal, echoed this sentiment, highlighting the gravity of Trudeau’s admission.
Trudeau’s acknowledgment is seen as a significant moment for India, reinforcing its stance that Canada has failed to provide evidence for its serious allegations. The Ministry of External Affairs welcomed this development, asserting that it confirms New Delhi’s position amidst the escalating diplomatic tensions between the two nations.
Hardeep Nijjar was shot dead in Surrey, British Columbia, in June 2023. Following his death, Trudeau made allegations of Indian involvement, leading to a diplomatic crisis characterized by reciprocal expulsions of diplomats. The latest fallout from Trudeau’s testimony may further complicate relations between Canada and India as both nations navigate this contentious issue.
