Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh delivered a scathing speech in Lok Sabha during a debate commemorating the adoption of the Indian Constitution on November 26, 1949. Singh accused a particular political party, indirectly referencing the Congress, of attempting to “hijack and appropriate” the legacy of Constitution-making in India while sidelining the contributions of others.
History of Constitution-Making Was Hidden
Rajnath Singh alleged that significant aspects of the history of Constitution-making in India were concealed from the public. “There have been deliberate attempts to black out the contributions of certain individuals and groups who played a vital role in upholding constitutional values,” Singh remarked.
The Defence Minister emphasised the need to acknowledge the efforts of various unsung heroes in shaping and defending the Indian Constitution, sparking a heated discussion in the House.
Veer Savarkar Mention Sparks Uproar
Singh’s mention of Veer Savarkar as one of the contributors to the values enshrined in the Constitution led to an uproar from Opposition benches. This controversial reference highlighted the ideological divide between the ruling BJP and the Opposition on interpreting historical contributions.
Highlighting Judicial Sacrifices
In his address, Rajnath Singh paid tribute to Justice HR Khanna, whose dissenting judgment during the Emergency (1975-77) under the Indira Gandhi government cost him the position of Chief Justice of India. Singh lauded Khanna for prioritising constitutional integrity over personal advancement.
The Defence Minister also criticised past Congress governments for undermining judicial independence. He pointed to the 1973 instance when the Congress government superseded Justices JM Shelat, KS Hegde, and AN Grover to appoint the fourth-most senior judge as the Chief Justice of India. Singh called it a blatant disregard for constitutional principles.
Upholding Constitutional Values
Concluding his speech, Singh urged Parliament to honour the Constitution’s architects and defenders, transcending political differences. “The Constitution is a sacred document, and its legacy must be protected from distortions,” he said.
The debate underscored the ongoing political tussle over historical narratives and the enduring relevance of constitutional values in India’s democracy.
