The Delhi High Court issued a notice today in relation to Sukesh Chandrasekar’s request to review the sentence that the jail authorities had imposed on him.
From May 1 to May 15, 2023, he will not be allowed to use the canteen, family gatherings, or phone calls, according to a jail order. The jail administration was given notice by Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma, who also asked them to submit a report on the plea. The subject is scheduled for another hearing on April 28. Nandita Rao, additional standing counsel, accepted the notification.
Advocate Anant Malik, the counsel for Sukesh Chandrasekar, argued that the two punishment tickets were issued to Sukesh Chandrasekar without hearing him. It is a violation of the principle of natural justice. It is a serious issue as the family of the Petitioner’s mother resides in Bangalore. There is an urgency and the punishment should be stayed.
On the other hand, Additional Standing Counsel (ASD) Nandita Rao opposed the submissions and argued that there is no urgency in the matter. She said that she would file a status report.The petitioner has prayed before the court to set aside and quash the Order of 17.04.2023 passed by the office of the Jail Deputy Superintendent of Prison, Mandoli, as well as stay on the execution of the said order until the adjudication of the instant Petition.
The Jail Deputy Superintendent has arbitrarily, erroneously and without any application of mind, awarded two punishment tickets against the Petitioner depriving him of the canteen facility and the Mulakat/Phone call facility for 15 days, the plea said.
It is also said that the Jail Superintendent was very well aware of the fact that these facilities are the only mode through which the Petitioner is able to communicate with his old mother who is currently residing in Bangalore and cannot travel to meet his son due to her health issues.
It is only through the phone calling facility that the Petitioner was able to be in touch with her and know about her well-being, especially when the Petitioner is an under-trial prisoner in various politically sensitive matters and is receiving life threats daily, the plea submitted.
Moreover, there exists a conflict of interest between the present Petitioner and the jail officials who have been threatening him and his family and causing them mental and physical agony, the plea submitted.
The Petitioner has also submitted that the said acts of the jail officials have been reported by the Petitioner before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Patiala House and the Hon’ble Court was pleased to give directions to conduct a special independent inquiry regarding the said complaints.
