The Rs 26,000 crore budgetary allocation for Bihar announced by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has triggered intense reactions from political leaders. The allocation, intended for various development projects in the state, has been dismissed by the opposition as a mere “jhunjhuna” (distraction), especially in the context of the demand for special status that was not granted.
Key Details of the Budget Allocation
In the Union Budget 2024-25, the Centre allocated Rs 26,000 crore to Bihar for development projects, including:
- An industrial node at Gaya on the Amritsar-Kolkata Industrial Corridor.
- Road connectivity projects.
- Several new medical colleges and infrastructure improvements.
Opposition Leaders’ Reactions
Independent MP Pappu Yadav criticized the allocation, questioning the effectiveness of the budget in creating jobs and addressing migration issues. He also expressed frustration over the lack of a special package or special state status.
Former Bihar CM Rabri Devi from RJD called the Rs 26,000 crore allocation a “jhunjhuna,” arguing that it does not address pressing issues such as crime, unemployment, and farmer problems.
Ruling Party Defends the Allocation
JD(U) leader Neeraj Kumar acknowledged the expectations from the budget but defended the allocation, particularly highlighting the focus on roadways and infrastructure. He pointed out that the region’s special status had been debated for years and emphasized the positive aspects of the current budget.
BJP MLA Tarkishore Prasad praised the budget for including three new expressways, medical colleges, and infrastructure investments, dismissing opposition claims as politically motivated.
Bihar Minister Dilip Jaiswal welcomed the allocation, describing it as a significant development for the state. He highlighted new infrastructure projects, including bridges and a power plant, and expressed gratitude towards the central government.
Overall Reaction
The budget allocation has sparked a heated debate, with opposition leaders questioning its adequacy and the ruling party defending it as a substantial investment in Bihar’s development. The discussions reflect ongoing tensions over the state’s development needs and political priorities.
