The Delhi Police stated on Tuesday that the current accused is responsible for the offence, which carries a life sentence or the death penalty, and they rejected the bail request of accused Neelam Azad in the Parliament security breach case.
The accusations made against the defendant are vile, serious, and extremely serious. The police claim that the accused are involved in undermining India’s sovereignty and integrity.
The current accused is not entitled to bail because there is compelling, convincing, clinching, and credible material, evidence, and other documents against him. According to the police, there is sufficient, substantial, and appropriate evidence, along with other documents, against the current accused that demonstrate his involvement.
The police further stated that the material, evidence and other documentary evidence show her complicity in the offence and thus disentitle her to be released on bail.
Prima facie, there are reasonable grounds against the accused person that negate the extension of bail considering the fact that the investigation is pending, said the Delhi Police.
The accused persons are powerful and influential, which is detrimental to the investigating agency if they are released on bail. The nature of the offence, or gravity of the offence, and the severity of punishment are also relevant considerations at the stage of consideration of bail, further stated the Delhi Police.
Advocate Akhand Pratap Singh appeared for the Delhi Police and Advocate Suresh Chaudhary appeared for the accused, Neelam Azad, in the matter.