Imran gets protective bail in terror case

Former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan has been approved a protective bail till 1 September in a terrorism case which was registered against him for threatening the additional sessions judge of the federal capital, Zeba Chaudhry, and police officials.

An anti-terrorism court in Islamabad on Thursday approved the interim bail of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief after he appeared before the court. The bail was approved against a surety bond of Rs 100,000 and a notice has been issued to the state as well. This comes as Imran Khan was booked in a terrorism case late Saturday on the complaint of Islamabad Saddar Magistrate Ali Javed. However, the former Prime Minister’s bail has been approved against a surety bond of Rs 100,000 and he was ordered to appear before the court on September 1.

However, the court rejected a request by PTI counsel Babar Awan for an extended bail. He prayed the PTI chief is contesting elections in nine constituencies. The court stated that it is granting interim bail till September 1 for now. Security was beefed up at the Federal Judicial Complex where Khan appeared, the Dawn reported.

On Wednesday, Imran Khan chaired a meeting of the party’s legal committee where it was decided that an application seeking the ex-Prime Minister’s bail would be filed in the ATC Islamabad. “Imran Khan will go there himself. God willing, we will all go together tomorrow,” he said. Earlier on 20 August, the PTI chief had staged a rally in Islamabad to express solidarity with his chief of staff, Shahbaz Gill, after claims of torture in custody. He warned the Islamabad inspector-general and deputy inspector-general that he would “not spare” them, vowing to file cases against them for subjecting Gill to alleged inhuman torture, Geo News reported. Imran’s lawyers filed a petition seeking pre-arrest bail on his behalf in a terrorism case registered for ‘threatening’ a female judge and senior police officers in a public rally. The pre-arrest bail plea contended the case was based on “surmises and conjectures” and that no evidence was available on record against Imran in connection with the case. It also contended that there was no “direct or indirect” evidence available on record against Imran in the case.

TDG Network

Recent Posts

Hamas Yet To Respond To Gaza Ceasefire Deal Amid Continued Mediation Efforts

Talks for a Gaza ceasefire deal continue with Israel and Hamas, but Hamas' lack of…

5 minutes ago

Indira Gandhi Bhawan: A Fresh Start for Congress or Just Another Landmark?

After a prolonged wait, Congress finally inaugurated its long-awaited permanent headquarters on Wednesday, a significant…

14 minutes ago

SC Questions Punjab’s Claim on Farmer Leader Dallewal’s Health Amidst 49-Day Hunger Strike, Seeks AIIMS Opinion; Urges Swift Resolution to Farmers’ Demands

Expressing concerns over the deteriorating health of farmer leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal, who has been…

22 minutes ago

Nearly 50,000 International Students Missing In Canada, India Tops The List, Raising Visa Concerns

Nearly 50,000 international students are missing from Canadian colleges and universities, with Indian nationals making…

28 minutes ago

Kharge jibes Bhagwat over his true independence comments, says if he continues to speak in this way it will tough for him to roam freely

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Wednesday slammed Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat's 'true Independence' remark, warning him…

31 minutes ago

Rahul stokes controversy while attacking RSS’s Bhagwat, says ‘We are fighting BJP, RSS, and the Indian state itself’

Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday stirred controversy after…

41 minutes ago