Leaders of the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliance in Maharashtra on Tuesday expressed shock over Sharad Pawar’s decision to resign as NCP chief and said his guidance was needed at this juncture.
Senior state Congress leader Balasaheb Thorat said Pawar should not step aside when a “new freedom struggle” is going on. “Sharad Pawar’s presence has extraordinary importance when a new battle for freedom is going on in the country to save the Constitution and democracy, and in such a situation, Pawar should not step aside,” he said.
Prithviraj Chavan, a senior Congress leader and former chief minister, said the decision has taken everyone by surprise. “A lot of party workers and leaders are urging him to reconsider his decision, and we have to await the final outcome,” he said.
Sanjay Raut, a Rajya Sabha MP and leader of the Uddhav Thackeay-led Shiv Sena, who is considered to be close to Pawar, said the veteran politician had not retired from politics. “Leaders like Pawar never retire from politics or social work. This development pertains to their internal party matter, and it is not appropriate to comment on it,” he said. But the country and state need his guidance and leadership, Raut said. He also said that, considering “some recent developments, it (Pawar’s decision) was not unexpected.” He also recalled that Sena founder Bal Thackeray had, at one point in the 1990s, decided to step down but later changed his mind due to the party cadres’ insistence. Raut also said that the development would not affect the MVA.
Shiv Sena leader Chandrakant Khaire too recalled the episode of Thackeray’s resignation while stating that Pawar’s decision was “absolutely unexpected.” Senior Congress leader and former chief minister Ashok Chavan said it was the NCP’s internal matter.
Saroj Patil, Pawar’s sister and wife of late Peasants and Workers Party leader N. D. Patil, said the decision was a big jolt to everyone. “People are crying… He has announced the decision at a time when there is an atmosphere of anarchism and anxiety, a question is being asked whether democracy will survive or not, and a rift is being created between communities,” she added.
She noted that Pawar’s health was important and that he wanted to create alternative leadership. “This reasoning is also true, but he should create leadership before leaving the position,” Patil added.