The analytical literature review is not only part of the theoretical section of diplomas and dissertations. Additionally, it may be used independently. Abstracts and monographs devoted to a theoretical examination of the subject and analysis of previous publications are examples of creating an analytical review of scientific literature.
Why do we need an analytical literature review
A literature review is a summary of existing views and perspectives on the subject of the study or within a particular scientific field. It should only reference works written by well-known authors whose subjects and content are closely connected to your research. An expert writer who also provides university assignment help to students believes that a review is not always necessary, despite the fact that any scholarly publication depends on the views of renowned authors. The amount of your output, level of novelty, topic’s applicability, and discipline of choice are all important considerations.
An analytical literature review is essential if you are writing a serious research paper. Why is it crucial for a good essay or dissertation?
- You will examine every conceivable piece of literature on your subject, including works in other languages, while you write your review.
- You will research and choose for yourself solutions to problems that have previously been discovered and are detailed in previous studies. This will reduce your hands-on time.
- You can learn all the terminology related to the topic.
- Define the issue of your research’s current significance and provide a justification for its innovation in science.
This serves as both the foundation and a significant portion of the theoretical portion of every scientific work. The first (theoretical) section of a diploma, PhD, or doctoral dissertation must contain an analytical review of the literature on the subject of the research, an abstract, or both.
Of course, it is far less in volume in term or dissertation papers than in theses. But a literature review is not required, for instance, in essays, notes, or reports. It is not worth wasting valuable material on literary analysis in these relatively little pieces.
How to do a literature review for a diploma: nuances and details
Gather all the resources you’ll need on your subject before you begin writing your review. No matter what kind of publications they are, it does not matter as long as they answer all of your questions and cover the entire subject. You should read scientific publications, other people’s reports, dissertations, monographs, author interviews, and periodicals.
The next step is to analyze the texts. Start with the most extensive and well-known sources on your list to save time. They’ll probably give you enough details to finish handling publications before time runs out.
After analyzing the sources, you can finally start working on your assignment, which includes developing the relevance and objectives, the scientific novelty of your research, and analyzing and contrasting other credible viewpoints on the subject.
It is important to consider the following details while writing an analytical literature review for a degree or other type of scientific research:
- A literature analysis does not list every single source that was used in your work. You should only use the most important, serious, thorough, and authoritative articles that are closely relevant to your issue for the analysis;
- You cannot just retell the opinions and works of others. You must compare various approaches, examine viewpoints, and derive your own findings from them in an analytical review.
- Do not prepare a literature review just for the sake of formality. You must evaluate the sources in order to comprehend the subject matter better. The student should create a source analysis first, and only then start writing the paper. Without it, it is impossible to gain a thorough comprehension of the subject and the discipline.
Common mistakes in preparing a literature review
The most common mistakes students make are related to the volume, depth of analysis, and details of the review. The first (and most frequent) mistake is too many sources. This makes it impossible to conduct an adequate analysis of opinions, and the theoretical part becomes excessively large.
The second is that there isn’t enough data in the review. This happens if the literature has been selected incorrectly, and the selected authors describe the problem only from one side. This can be avoided by taking analysis seriously and authoritative publications that already include a complete analysis of the issue.
Retelling the material instead of studying it is a third frequent mistake. You want to study various approaches, contrast them, and develop your own opinion rather than just discussing other people’s scientific work.
Not only students but also experienced scientists and researchers are capable of making mistakes. You won’t be able to properly start your own research without first creating a review; it’s not just a formality; it’s an essential component of your work. Any author should therefore take great care and responsibility while putting up a literature review because the quality of your research paper, diploma, or dissertation depends on how you handle your sources.