-
On GST Appellate Tribunal; Government Constitutes GoM
-
SUPREME COURT: ELECTRICITY CANNOT BE DENIED TO TENANT MERELY BECAUSE LANDLORD REFUSED TO ISSUE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE
-
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT DECLINES PLEA BY 71-YR-OLD SEEKING APPOINTMENT AS CHIEF ENGINEER; SRI RAM JANMA BHUMI TRUST NOT STATE UNDER ARTICLE 12
-
Seeking permission to export embryo to surrogate in California; plea in Delhi High Court
-
Delhi High Court asks special courts to grant interim relief compensation to child victims without waiting for them to move an application; Posco Act
-
KERALA HIGH COURT ASKS STATE TO ENSURE DROP BOXES IN SCHOOLS FOR STUDENTS TO SUBMIT THEIR COMPLAINTS ANONYMOUSLY
-
Bambiha Group ‘gangsters’ allege deprivation of basic necessities in jail, Punjab & Haryana High Court seeks ADG’s reply
-
TIME EXTENDED FOR GOOGLE INDIA TO REPLY TO CCI PROBE ON PLAYSTORE PAYMENT POLICY: KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
-
OBJECTION REGARDING ‘EXCEPTED MATTER’ WOULD BE AN AFTER-THOUGHT IF IT WAS NOT RAISED BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR: DELHI HIGH COURT
-
PUNJAB & HARYANA HC GRANTS BAIL TO MAN BOOKED UNDER POSCO ACT ON CHARGES BY WIFE REGARDING INCIDENT THAT TOOK PLACE WHEN SHE WAS A MINOR
-
Allahabad High Court refuses to quash case against government, madrasa teachers allegedly found with cow meat, 16 live cattle stock
-
MP HIGH COURT SEEKS DGP’S REPLY: DOES POLICE’S FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE FULL CRIMINAL ANTECEDENTS OF ACCUSED AMOUNTS TO MISCONDUCT, INTERFERENCE WITH JUSTICE?
-
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT APPLIES TO ARBITRATION REFERENCE UNDER NATIONAL HIGHWAY ACT, 1956
-
KERALA HIGH COURT APPOINTS AMICUS CURIAE IN SARITHA NAIR’S PLEA; IS A STATEMENT RECORDED U/S 164 CRPC A PUBLIC DOCUMENT?
-
Supreme Court issues notice in an SLP; can section 156 (3) CRPC be invoked after failing to get desired relief in a civil suit?
-
MP HIGH COURT SEEKS DGP’S REPLY: DOES POLICE’S FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE FULL CRIMINAL ANTECEDENTS OF ACCUSED AMOUNTS TO MISCONDUCT, INTERFERENCE WITH JUSTICE?
-
KERALA HIGH COURT APPOINTS AMICUS CURIAE IN SARITHA NAIR’S PLEA; IS A STATEMENT RECORDED U/S 164 CRPC A PUBLIC DOCUMENT?
-
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT APPLIES TO ARBITRATION REFERENCE UNDER NATIONAL HIGHWAY ACT, 1956
-
Supreme Court issues notice in an SLP; can section 156 (3) CRPC be invoked after failing to get desired relief in a civil suit?
-
Bombay High Court: No Absolute Right Under RTE Act For Admission To Unaided Minority Schools
-
GUJARAT HIGH COURT: ABSENCE OF THREAT TO APPLICANT, NO GROUND TO REFUSE FIREARM LICENSE UNDER ARMS ACT.
-
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT: IN CASE OF DOWRY, ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED; ALL FAMILY MEMBERS ARE BEING ROPED IN, ATTEMPTED MURDER.
-
‘MAY CAUSE MENTAL TRAUMA’: DELHI HIGH COURT REFUSES TO INTERFERE WITH CHILD’S 9 DAYS’ CUSTODY TO MOTHER FOR FOREIGN TRAVEL
-
‘No urgency’: Supreme Court adjourns Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s plea seeking to shift him, wife from Tihar jail
-
Presidential election: Supreme Court refuses to interfere with rejection of candidate’s nomination
-
GAUHATI HIGH COURT QUASHES NO-CONFIDENCE MOTION AGAINST GRAM PANCHAYAT PRESIDENT CITING PARTICIPATION OF MEMBER DISQUALIFIED FOR HAVING THREE CHILDREN
-
Halt DDA’s demolition action against jhuggis in Nizamuddin’s Gyaspur area, orders Delhi High Court
-
KALKAJI TEMPLE: SUPREME COURT GRANTS TWO WEEKS’ TIME FOR UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS TO VACATE PREMISES
-
Halt DDA’s demolition action against jhuggis in Nizamuddin’s Gyaspur area, orders Delhi High Court
-
GAUHATI HIGH COURT QUASHES NO-CONFIDENCE MOTION AGAINST GRAM PANCHAYAT PRESIDENT CITING PARTICIPATION OF MEMBER DISQUALIFIED FOR HAVING THREE CHILDREN
-
‘NO ONE IS HERE’: SUPREME COURT VACATION BENCH RISES IN 30 MINUTES AFTER NO LAWYER APPEARS IN REGULAR HEARING MATTERS
-
During bail hearing, Justice Surya Kant shares personal experience of theft in his agricultural land
-
MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT: MINIMUM SEVEN DAYS’ TIME BE GIVEN TO THE ASSESSEE TO RESPOND TO THE REASSESSMENT NOTICE
-
Karnataka High Court issues notice, asks state about the steps taken to prevent illegal slaughtering of animals
-
Look-out circular cannot be opened under the Benami Act
-
Right to clean and healthy environment is a fundamental right
-
TELANGANA HIGH COURT: PLACE OF RESIDENCE OF THE ARBITRATOR WOULD NOT BE THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION
-
DELHI HIGH COURT REMANDS IN THE MATTER BACK TO ASSESSING OFFICER AFTER SETTING ASIDE: JUST 3 DAYS’ TIME GRANTED TO RESPOND TO THE INCOME TAX NOTICE
Advertisement
Advertisement
