Far-right activist Laura Loomer targeted FBI chief Kash Patel, who is of Indian origin, in a social media post after his recent visit to Doha. She wrote: “You are an Indian. Do you know the Qataris make Indians like you slaves under Kafala? They built their buildings with Indian slave labour.”
‘You’re an Indian…’ Laura Loomer Draws Backlash with Racist Remark on FBI Chief Kash Patel Over Qatar Visit
Loomer criticised Patel’s decision to sign security agreements with Qatari authorities. She accused him of ignoring migrant labour abuse and aligning with what she calls “pro-Islamic terror interests.” The remarks stirred immediate outrage. Many condemned the post as racist, insulting, and unacceptable.
Why Kash Patel Qatar Visit Triggered Backlash?
Patel visited Doha to sign Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with Qatari officials. The agreements deal with intelligence sharing, training, and other cooperation ahead of major global events planned in Qatar.
Laura Loomer framed the visit as a betrayal, accusing Patel of siding with a country she claims abuses Indian migrant labour and funds extremist groups.
Critics argue her response reflects prejudice and xenophobia. Many questioned the appropriateness of attacking someone based on heritage instead of focusing on the diplomatic actions themselves.
Who is Laura Loomer?
Laura Loomer is a US-based conservative activist and commentator known for frequent, controversial and incendiary statements. She has often targeted immigrants, minorities, and liberal politicians.
Her past remarks include calling Indian immigrants “third-world invaders” and making ethnic jokes about prominent politicians of Indian origin. Loomer also runs a consulting firm and hosts a show, but her recent rhetoric has drawn strong criticism from many quarters, including some within her own political circles.
Reactions: Outcry, Condemnations & Calls for Action
Laura Loomer’s comments provoked widespread condemnation. Many users on social media described the remark as “racist,” “disgusting,” and “deeply offensive.”
Critics argued that targeting someone’s ethnic background rather than policy decisions undermines political debate and fuels communal hatred. Several voices also pointed out the hypocrisy, noting that such rhetoric damages the broader community and undermines constructive criticism of foreign policies.
Immigration, Identity & Political Rhetoric
The incident highlights ongoing tensions in political discourse over immigration, identity, and foreign policy. It underscores how rhetorical attacks — especially those targeting heritage or ethnicity — can inflame social division.
Analysts say this episode may mark a turning point in how far-right narratives are challenged, and stress the need for accountability when public figures dehumanise individuals or communities based on origin.
