A court hearing Friday of President Donald Trump’s bid to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook from office concluded without an immediate decision in the unprecedented legal battle, and she will stay put for the time being. Following two hours of hearing oral arguments in a Washington, D.C., courtroom, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb instructed lawyers for Cook to submit a brief on Tuesday presenting in greater detail their grounds for asserting the removal was illegal.
The case, which will almost certainly land in the laps of the U.S. Supreme Court, has implications for whether or not the Fed can make interest rate policy independently of politicians’ desires, generally considered to be essential to any central bank’s capacity to keep prices from rising.
The Fed stated it would respect any court ruling. It has provided no hint that Cook’s position as a member of its Board of Governors has been altered, and she is still listed on its website as an active member of some internal committees. Fears surrounding the independence of the Fed from the White House in monetary policy making could have a snowball effect across the world’s economy. The U.S. dollar fell against other significant currencies following Trump’s declaration that he would fire Cook.
Also read: Who is Lisa Cook, the Federal Reserve Governor Fired by Donald Trump?
Who is Lisa Cook?
Dr. Lisa Cook is a proficient American economist and public officer whose professional and academic life has been characterized by notable achievements in academics as well as her professional career. Her academic path commenced as the first Marshall Scholar from Spelman College, a historically Black women’s college. She later earned a second B.A. in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics from the University of Oxford and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of California, Berkeley, with a specialization in macroeconomics and international economics.
Cook’s Education and Her Journey
Prior to her current affiliation, Dr. Cook has served in a number of senior faculty positions, such as professor in the Department of Economics and International Relations at Michigan State University and on the faculty at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. Her work as an academic scholar is best known for its attention to the economic effects of racial inequality. Her pioneering research has provided unambiguous evidence of the connection between violent racial assaults and the decline in economic performance, in this case establishing that lynching of Black Americans between 1870 and 1940 led to a sharp decline in the issuance of patents to Black inventors. She has also carried out research on post-Soviet Russian and Nigerian economies and the determinants of contemporary gender and racial imbalances in innovation. Cook boasts a strong public service background, having worked as a senior economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisers for President Barack Obama between 2011 and 2012 and as a senior advisor in the Treasury Department’s Office of International Affairs between 2000 and 2001. In 2022, President Joe Biden nominated her to the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors, and she was confirmed by a slim 51-50 vote, becoming the first Black woman to serve in the role in the more than 100-year history of the institution.
Also read: US Fed Governor Lisa Cook Sues Donald Trump Over Attempted Firing
She was subsequently confirmed for a full 14-year term in September 2023. The recent effort by President Donald Trump to oust Dr. Cook from office is the first-ever challenge to the independence of the Federal Reserve.
Dr. Cook Denies Wrongdoing, Refuses to Resign
The president cited accusations of mortgage fraud, which were filed by a Trump appointee, as justification for her removal. Nonetheless, Dr. Cook has neither been charged with nor convicted of any improprieties, and the charges are concerned with conduct prior to her time at the Fed. She responded by announcing that she will not resign on the grounds that a president may only dismiss a Fed governor “for cause,” a legal mandate usually understood to mean bad behavior in office. The ensuing legal struggle is now likely to be taken to the Supreme Court, where it might set a significant precedent for the power of a president over independent federal agencies.
Also read: Donald Trump Says Ukraine War Wouldn’t Have Happened if…
