Home > World > US > Key Witness Sues to Block Evidence as DOJ Considers New Charges Against Comey

Key Witness Sues to Block Evidence as DOJ Considers New Charges Against Comey

Daniel Richman’s lawsuit to block evidence from his seized devices complicates the DOJ's path to re-indict James Comey, following a case dismissed due to an unlawfully appointed prosecutor and now-challenged investigative methods.

Published By: Prakriti Parul
Last Updated: December 3, 2025 00:53:50 IST

A central figure in the dismissed case against former FBI Director James Comey has filed a lawsuit seeking to bar federal prosecutors from using crucial evidence, creating a new legal obstacle as the Justice Department reportedly considers a second indictment. The move challenges the foundation of any potential renewed case against Donald Trump’s perceived political adversary.

Who Filed the Lawsuit and Why?

Daniel Richman, a Columbia Law School professor and former lawyer for James Comey, filed the lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C. He argues that evidence taken from his electronic devices by the FBI in 2019 and 2020 was misused. His suit says this violated his Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and he wants a judge to order the government to delete or return the material and stop using it in the future.

Also Read: Review Backs Hepatitis B Shot for Newborns, Clashing With Push to Delay

Why Is This Evidence So Important to the Case?

The material taken from Richman formed the core of the original criminal case against Comey. Prosecutors used it to charge Comey with making false statements and obstructing Congress. They alleged he lied to a Senate committee in 2020 when he said he stood by prior testimony that he had not authorized FBI officials to act as anonymous sources for news reports about an investigation into Hillary Clinton.Richman was identified as the person who communicated with reporters.

What Other Problems Have Plagued This Prosecution?

This lawsuit is the latest setback in the case. Just last month, Judge William Fitzpatrick said prosecutors might have made “serious errors” when they rechecked the Richman material for the Comey inquiry without securing a new warrant. Later, the whole case against Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James was dismissed after it was found that lead prosecutor Lindsey Halligan had been improperly appointed.

Also Read: Putin Meets Trump Envoys in Kremlin, Hails Possible ‘Basis’ for Ukraine Peace

What Happens Next for the DOJ?

According to recent reports, the Justice Department is actively weighing whether to seek a new indictment against Comey, potentially as soon as this week. However, Richman’s lawsuit now presents a significant procedural hurdle.If he succeeds in having the key evidence thrown out, it could severely undermine or even prevent a new case from moving forward, regardless of how a new prosecution team is assembled.

Latest News

The Daily Guardian is India’s fastest
growing News channel and enjoy highest
viewership and highest time spent amongst
educated urban Indians.

Follow Us

© Copyright ITV Network Ltd 2025. All right reserved.

The Daily Guardian is India’s fastest growing News channel and enjoy highest viewership and highest time spent amongst educated urban Indians.

© Copyright ITV Network Ltd 2025. All right reserved.