+
  • HOME»
  • Supreme Court Dismisses Proceedings in Sadhguru's Illegal Confinement Case

Supreme Court Dismisses Proceedings in Sadhguru's Illegal Confinement Case

In a significant development for Sadhguru and the Isha Foundation, the Supreme Court of India has decided to close the proceedings concerning allegations of illegal confinement involving two women. The ruling comes after a thorough review of the case, which had garnered substantial media attention and public scrutiny. The controversy began when claims surfaced that […]

Supreme Court Dismisses Proceedings in Sadhguru's Illegal Confinement Case
Supreme Court Dismisses Proceedings in Sadhguru's Illegal Confinement Case

In a significant development for Sadhguru and the Isha Foundation, the Supreme Court of India has decided to close the proceedings concerning allegations of illegal confinement involving two women. The ruling comes after a thorough review of the case, which had garnered substantial media attention and public scrutiny.

The controversy began when claims surfaced that two women were allegedly confined against their will at the Isha Foundation’s ashram in Tamil Nadu. Following these allegations, legal actions were initiated, and the matter escalated to the Supreme Court.

In its recent decision, the court concluded that the allegations lacked sufficient evidence to proceed further. This ruling has been met with relief by Sadhguru’s supporters and the Isha Foundation, who maintained that the claims were unfounded and aimed at tarnishing the organization’s reputation.

Sadhguru, a prominent spiritual leader and founder of the Isha Foundation, expressed gratitude for the court’s decision, stating, “Truth has prevailed. We have always upheld the principles of integrity and respect for all individuals.”

The Isha Foundation, known for its yoga programs and social initiatives, has faced criticism in the past, but this latest verdict marks a turning point in its ongoing legal challenges. As the organization continues its work, this closure allows them to focus on their mission without the shadow of legal disputes.

Legal experts have noted that this case highlights the complexities involved in allegations of this nature, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations before conclusions are drawn.

The Supreme Court’s ruling not only brings closure to this specific case but also underscores the judiciary’s role in upholding justice while protecting individual rights against unfounded allegations.

Advertisement