For years, global markets have questioned the impact of China’s competitive strategies—often aided by state support—across industries ranging from consumer electronics to heavy machinery. Yet, beneath the surface of traditional exports lies an equally formidable engine: a domestic cybersecurity ecosystem with growing regional influence. Nowhere is this more evident than in India, where Beijing’s technological reach increasingly shapes digital governance frameworks.
In India, this highlights citizens’ awareness of digital regulations, particularly following the 2008 amendment to the IT Act, which governs online content and cybersecurity. This amendment to the 2000 law allows central and state governments to punish or censor people for publishing or messaging unwanted or inflammatory content.
Unlike typical software export stories, SentinelLabs recently revealed how Chinese tech firms offer legitimate services to civilians while providing Censorship-as-a-Service (CaaS) to governments, raising critical concerns about transparency and market fairness. If a cybersecurity firm can deliver standard Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR) solutions to private customers while enabling government content-monitoring platforms, it significantly alters the risk landscape for businesses operating in India. Companies striving to protect customer data may unknowingly operate within a broader ecosystem where state-backed actors leverage CaaS to control digital narratives, creating new risks for enterprises navigating this market.
As if procuring technology was not already challenging enough, businesses must now scrutinize potential partners for hidden ties to clandestine monitoring operations, ensuring their security strategies do not inadvertently expose them to state-driven digital influence campaigns.
The TopSec Leak: Unveiling the Dual-Use Threat
SentinelLabs’ report, Censorship as a Service | Leak Reveals Public-Private Collaboration to Monitor Chinese Cyberspace, centers on leaked work logs from Beijing-based TopSec. A long-established cybersecurity vendor, TopSec, offers EDR, vulnerability scanning, and other mainstream solutions. However, the files reveal additional functionality designed to track “sensitive words” and suspicious web content—indicating active content moderation tools with implications for India’s digital landscape.
Within the logs, analysts found references to DevOps frameworks such as Docker, Ansible, and Kubernetes. Yet instead of focusing solely on corporate threats like malware, TopSec’s scripts discuss “sensitive” web content, hidden links, and censorship triggers. Code names like “Sparta” describe modules designed to monitor or block content across client networks.
High-risk content is escalated even through WeChat, raising concerns about data security, as organizations using TopSec’s services may be unwittingly funneling internal alerts through a platform the government can freely audit. SentinelLabs also notes TopSec’s ties to state-owned enterprises, including agencies investigating corruption. In one case, monitoring for sensitive content was requested by a person acting on behalf of a local government entity the same day that news broke regarding an official’s corruption probe in that government office, suggesting that commercial tools are being leveraged to shape public perception—a scenario that could impact Indian businesses navigating regulatory and operational risks.
FORTIFYING DEFENCES IN A CENSORED LANDSCAPE
Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) thrives on franchising malicious tools to individuals or groups, turning cybercrime into a revenue stream. Security teams must now accept that CaaS may be even more far-reaching. In both cases, clients license platforms designed for specific outcomes.
Sophisticated state or corporate actors could harness CaaS to manipulate news outlets, undercut competition, or restrict employees’ access to market data—stifling innovation under the guise of “brand protection” or “cybersecurity.” If these capabilities proliferate within India’s market, smaller players in global supply chains may feel pressured to adopt similarly aggressive solutions, hastening the fragmentation of open markets.
While RaaS primarily aims to monetize stolen data, CaaS raises the stakes by controlling the flow of information. In extreme cases, entire communities or workforces could be selectively shielded from public scrutiny, implicating corporate espionage and fundamental ethical considerations.
Strategic decision-makers must now design threat models that account not just for technological risks, but for the geopolitical landscape influencing cybersecurity policies. A cybersecurity provider’s architecture is no longer a neutral element; it can be weaponized to shape corporate and public discourse.
Addressing The New Cyber Risk Paradigm With AI
TopSec’s collaboration with state-affiliated organizations illustrates how commercial cybersecurity solutions can become de facto government policy tools. Public-private partnerships are not unusual in many regions, particularly where governments frequently collaborate with tech firms to secure digital infrastructure. Yet, what sets this instance apart is the potential for censorship tools to trickle into less benign use cases. Shadowy operators could employ these services to stifle employee communication, remove external viewpoints, or suppress competitive data.
Defending against such a scenario begins with stronger technological safeguards. As described in Forgotten Credentials in the Cloud, even a single exposed credential can compromise entire systems. Automated security offers the most promising line of defense by detecting anomalies in real time, automatically revoking leaked credentials, and limiting the lateral movement of unauthorized users.
This heightened vigilance protects organizations from infiltration by advanced adversaries aiming to surreptitiously install censorship frameworks. It also addresses broader reputational risks. Enterprises prioritizing robust credential management and AI-based intrusion detection significantly reduce the odds of unknowingly becoming a conduit for anti-competitive, state-driven agendas. In the future, the willingness to invest in AI-centric security may serve as a key differentiator for businesses seeking both operational stability and global credibility.
Securing Trust In Challenging Times
The emergence of Censorship-as-a-Service raises urgent questions about where private cybersecurity ends and state influence begins. For business leaders operating in India, risk tolerance must now account for whether cutting-edge security software could morph into a tool for targeted content control.
By coupling rigorous supply chain oversight with AI-enhanced protection, organizations can guard against misuse and reinforce the open flow of information—safeguarding not just corporate data but also the principles that underpin fair competition and free enterprise.
The author, Mr Diwakar Daya is the Managing Director & Area Vice President – India & SAARC at SentinelOne.
