Vietnam’s Delay In EU Meeting Over Russian Sanctions Raises Questions

Vietnam’s foreign affairs ministry has stirred unease within the European Union by delaying a scheduled meeting next week with the EU’s top official on Russian sanctions, as speculation mounts over a potential visit to Hanoi by Russian President Vladimir Putin. The decision to postpone the meeting with the EU envoy, David O’Sullivan, who is responsible […]

by Vishakha Bhardwaj - May 9, 2024, 4:22 pm

Vietnam’s foreign affairs ministry has stirred unease within the European Union by delaying a scheduled meeting next week with the EU’s top official on Russian sanctions, as speculation mounts over a potential visit to Hanoi by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The decision to postpone the meeting with the EU envoy, David O’Sullivan, who is responsible for overseeing the implementation of EU sanctions, has drawn criticism from EU diplomats. Originally planned for May 13-14, Vietnamese officials cited scheduling conflicts as the reason for the delay, prompting disappointment from EU representatives.

While Vietnam has maintained a stance of neutrality in its foreign policy, refraining from openly condemning Russia’s actions in Ukraine, this move has raised eyebrows among Western countries. Concerns have been voiced that Vietnam’s alignment with Russia may be jeopardizing its relations with the EU, a significant trading partner.

Speculation surrounding Putin’s potential visit to Vietnam has added further complexity to the situation. Despite an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court over alleged war crimes in Ukraine, Vietnamese leaders have extended invitations to Putin in recent months. Reports suggest that Putin has accepted the invitation, with discussions regarding the visit expected to take place after his inauguration for a fifth term as president on May 7.

Russia’s strategic importance to Vietnam, both as a major supplier of weapons and a partner in the exploitation of gas reserves in the South China Sea, underscores the significance of its relationship with Moscow. However, this relationship comes under scrutiny amid the EU’s imposition of sanctions on Russia over its conflict in Ukraine.

O’Sullivan’s role in ensuring compliance with EU sanctions highlights the need for vigilance against any potential violations, including the circumvention of punitive measures through trade activities. While there is no evidence to suggest direct support from Vietnam to Russia, concerns remain over the possibility of illicit trade that could breach EU sanctions, particularly concerning dual-use goods.

The postponement of the EU meeting underscores the delicate balancing act Vietnam faces in maintaining relations with both the EU and Russia, amid heightened geopolitical tensions and economic considerations. As discussions continue to unfold, observers await further developments in this evolving diplomatic landscape.