Supreme Court transfers Gyanvapi case to Varanasi district judge

The Supreme Court on Friday ordered the transfer of the Gyanvapi mosque case from the civil judge to the district judge of Varanasi.

A bench of Justices D.Y. Chandrachud, Surya Kant and P.S. Narasimha ordered that a “senior and experienced” judicial officer of Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service should examine the case. The bench said the District Judge should decide the maintainability of the civil suit in the Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath case on priority as sought by the Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Varanasi.

“Having regard to the sensitivity of this civil suit, this case before the civil judge Varanasi shall stand transferred and be heard by a senior and experienced judicial officer of UP Judicial services. Thus the case was transferred from Civil Judge (senior division), Varanasi to District Judge, Varanasi. The application filed by the plaintiff under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC shall be decided on priority by the District Judge on the transfer of suit,” the bench ordered.

It further ordered that its interim order passed on 17 May—to protect the area where the Shivling was found and access to Muslims

for namaz—shall continue in operation till the maintainability of the suit is decided and thereafter for eight weeks to enable parties to pursue legal remedies.

It further asked District Magistrate, Varanasi to make alternate arrangements for wazu after consulting the parties. It has now posted the matter for hearing in July second week. The apex court was hearing a plea by Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee against the Varanasi district court order, which directed a videographic survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex, adjacent to the Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi.

During the hearing, the bench suggested that the Gyanvapi mosque case should be heard by the District Judge in Varanasi. “A slightly more seasoned and mature hand should hear this case. We are not making aspersion on the trial judge. But more seasoned hand should deal with this case and it will benefit all the parties,” said the bench.

The bench said these were complex social problems and no solution by humans could be perfect. “Our order is to maintain a certain degree of peace and calm and our interim orders calm some frayed nerves with some healing touch. We are on a joint mission on preserving a sense of unification in the country,” Justice Chandrachud said.

Correspondent

Recent Posts

Ashok Gehlot Defends Rahul Gandhi, Launches Strong Attack On RSS

The BJP is intensifying its criticism of the remarks made by Leader of Opposition in…

6 minutes ago

India in intelligent era, tech-driven governance

BJP formed a third successive government under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Since…

34 minutes ago

Ceasefire in Gaza: A temporary respite or a prelude to future conflict?

The announcement of a ceasefire deal in conflict between Hamas and Israel This agreement marks…

38 minutes ago

Pope Francis Suffers Arm Injury After Second Fall in a Month

Pope Francis injured his arm after suffering his second fall within a month. The incident…

41 minutes ago

Brazil Former President Bolsonaro Denied Passport Return Ahead Of Trump’s Inauguration

Jair Bolsonaro’s passport remains seized as he faces coup-related charges. His attempt to attend Trump’s…

52 minutes ago

Russian Diplomats Sneaks Into UK Parliament’s Restricted Area, Sparking National Security Alarm

A group of Russian diplomats infiltrated a private section of UK Parliament during a tour,…

1 hour ago