SC DECLINES TO INTERFERE WITH CALCUTTA HC’S ORDER RESTRAINING ARREST OF BJP’S SUVENDU ADHIKARI

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain the West Bengal government’s appeal against the Calcutta High Court’s decision to protect Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Suvendu Adhikari from arrest in cases registered against him after he switched from Trinamool Congress (TMC) to BJP.

The Bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna while refusing to interfere with High Court’s order which restrained police from taking any coercive action against him said it is open for the state of West Bengal to file an affidavit before the High Court and seek an expeditious hearing. Representing the State of West Bengal, senior advocate Kalyan Bandopadhyay, termed the High Court order as unprecedented as it granted protection in all cases, present and future.

Bandopadhyay contended that High Court jumped to a conclusion while taking a prima facie view that there was an attempt at implicating and victimizing Adhikari by filing the criminal cases against him.

Senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for Adhikari, argued that the hearing before the single-judge bench of the High Court went on for about a month before the order was passed and it seems “uncharitable” to say that the judge after one month of hearing jumped to a conclusion.

Adhikari was accused of hooliganism, gathering an unlawful assembly and violation of COVID-19 guidelines, amongst other things. The state government had claimed that merely because the complaints were made after he made the switch from TMC to BJP, they cannot be said to be malicious.

Adhikari had earlier moved the High Court alleging that the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government was abusing the police machinery by registering FIRs against him in four different police stations.

The victimization and harassment by the West Bengal government had started immediately after he changed political allegiance in December 2020, BJP leader Adhikari had said.

The High Court in September this year while granting interim protection to Adhikari had observed that the West Bengal government was attempting to implicate and victimize Adhikari by filing criminal cases against him.

Adhikari was accused of hooliganism, gathering an unlawful assembly and violation of COVID-19 guidelines, amongst other things.

Correspondent

Recent Posts

Israel And Hamas Agree To Ceasefire, Ending 15-Month Conflict, Biden Confirms | Watch

The ceasefire, brokered by the US, Egypt, and Qatar, ends 15 months of fighting, with…

12 minutes ago

India-Bangladesh Border Talks Focus on Fencing, Infiltration

The India-Bangladesh DG-level border talks will address border fencing, infiltration, and cross-border crimes, marking the…

2 hours ago

Shortest Work-Week Nation Prepares for Snap Election

Vanuatu, known for its 24.7-hour work week, holds elections tomorrow following a devastating earthquake. Recovery…

2 hours ago

Hamas Yet To Respond To Gaza Ceasefire Deal Amid Continued Mediation Efforts

Talks for a Gaza ceasefire deal continue with Israel and Hamas, but Hamas' lack of…

2 hours ago

Indira Gandhi Bhawan: A Fresh Start for Congress or Just Another Landmark?

After a prolonged wait, Congress finally inaugurated its long-awaited permanent headquarters on Wednesday, a significant…

2 hours ago

SC Questions Punjab’s Claim on Farmer Leader Dallewal’s Health Amidst 49-Day Hunger Strike, Seeks AIIMS Opinion; Urges Swift Resolution to Farmers’ Demands

Expressing concerns over the deteriorating health of farmer leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal, who has been…

3 hours ago