India’s Path To Veto Power: 4 Obstacles To Become Permanent Membership

For decades, Indian politicians have championed the nation’s right to a seat on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), arguing that as an emerging superpower, India has been unjustly excluded from this prestigious platform. Despite backing from various foreign dignitaries and coalitions advocating for UNSC reform, experts remain skeptical about India’s prospects for permanent membership in the near future.

Key Challenges Hindering India’s Bid

India faces several significant hurdles that it must navigate to secure veto power within the UNSC.

China’s Reluctance

Among the five permanent members of the Security Council, the US, UK, France, and Russia have expressed support for India’s candidacy. However, China, as a key competitor, has consistently opposed India’s inclusion. Given its ongoing border disputes with India, China is unlikely to endorse any changes to the UNSC composition that could dilute its own influence. Moreover, China appears to be leveraging its position to counter India’s aspirations by hinting at support for India only if New Delhi refrains from backing Japan’s bid for a permanent seat.

Membership Without Veto Power

Some groups, including the Uniting for Consensus (UfC), argue for India’s admission as a non-permanent member without veto rights. They propose increasing the number of non-permanent seats to make the UN more representative and accountable. However, India has firmly stated that any new permanent members must also possess veto power, making this scenario unlikely.

Western Skepticism

While the US has formally supported India’s bid for permanent membership, there are doubts about the actual implementation of this support. Past behaviors of the P-5 countries indicate a reluctance to expand veto powers. Critics, including US-based experts, argue that India’s independent voting record—especially its abstentions on key issues like the Russian invasion of Ukraine—raises concerns about its alignment with Western priorities. This cautious approach makes it difficult for the West to fully endorse India’s bid.

Regional Instability

India’s influence in South Asia is complex and increasingly challenged by regional dynamics, particularly the competition with China. Issues related to India-Pakistan relations, as well as growing discontent in neighboring countries such as Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal, complicate India’s claim to leadership. The changing political landscape in these countries can undermine India’s regional standing and, by extension, its global aspirations.

The Path Forward for India

There is a growing consensus that the UN, particularly the Security Council, requires significant reform. Expanding the Council to include countries like India could enhance its legitimacy and effectiveness. However, to solidify its claim for permanent membership, India must actively address criticisms regarding its internal governance and democratic practices.

Issues such as economic inequality, political intolerance, and a lagging Human Development Index need to be prioritized. Strengthening India’s regional relationships and engaging more constructively with neighboring countries could also bolster its international standing.

In summary, while the call for reform within the UNSC resonates globally, India’s journey to permanent membership is fraught with challenges that require both strategic domestic reforms and astute international diplomacy.