• HOME»
  • Medically Speaking»
  • UK NHS Shifts to ‘People with Obesity’: A New Approach to Sensitive Healthcare Language

UK NHS Shifts to ‘People with Obesity’: A New Approach to Sensitive Healthcare Language

UK health officials direct NHS staff to use "people with obesity" instead of "obese," aiming for more respectful and sensitive language.

Advertisement
UK NHS Shifts to ‘People with Obesity’: A New Approach to Sensitive Healthcare Language

In a new guidance issued by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), NHS workers in the UK have been instructed to refrain from using the term “obese” and instead refer to individuals with excess weight as “people with obesity.” This move is part of a broader push to ensure that language used in healthcare settings remains sensitive and respectful, aligning with the principle that conditions should describe what a person has rather than defining the person themselves. NICE’s latest directive is a revision of their inclusive language guide, which aims to replace certain words that could be considered offensive or stigmatizing. Alongside “obese,” terms like “diabetics,” “schizophrenics,” and “alcoholics” are also being replaced with more person-centered language, such as “people with diabetes” or “people with schizophrenia.”

The intention behind these recommendations is to emphasize that conditions, not people, should be the focus of medical treatment. The guide suggests that labeling a person by their condition can diminish their humanity and perpetuate harmful stereotypes. For example, the term “obese” is often seen as dehumanizing, and NICE advocates for the more neutral “people with obesity” to help remove the stigma associated with this condition. The guide stresses that the aim is not to be politically correct but to use language that reflects good manners and sensitivity. According to NICE, the way medical professionals speak about their patients can influence the care and treatment patients receive, so using non-stigmatizing language is critical to promoting patient dignity and equality.

While the directive has been hailed by some as a progressive step toward fostering a more inclusive healthcare environment, it has also faced criticism. Some argue that the emphasis on language changes is a form of symbolic action that distracts from the more substantial issues facing the healthcare system. Dr. Alka Sehgal-Corbett, director of the campaign group Don’t Divide Us, questioned whether focusing on “policing language” was an effective use of resources. She expressed concerns that the NHS leadership was placing too much focus on semantics rather than addressing the underlying issues within the healthcare system, such as improving healthcare quality and management.

Lord Young, the founder of the Free Speech Union, also voiced his discontent, emphasizing that people with obesity would benefit more from tangible healthcare solutions rather than a change in terminology. He argued that individuals struggling with obesity need access to treatments, prescriptions, and healthcare professionals rather than the rebranding of their condition. Similarly, critics have pointed out that healthcare professionals should focus on providing practical solutions to health conditions rather than being overly concerned with how they refer to patients.

The push for language reform is not a new phenomenon in the UK healthcare system. In February 2023, NICE’s previous guidance faced scrutiny for encouraging the use of “pregnant people” as part of an initiative to embrace gender-neutral language. This recommendation stirred debate, with many questioning the necessity of such changes and whether they were more about political correctness than improving healthcare outcomes. Despite the backlash, NICE has continued to advocate for inclusive language that reflects the diverse and varied identities of patients, particularly as the UK healthcare system strives to be more inclusive and representative of all individuals.

In essence, the controversy surrounding NICE’s new guidance on language usage highlights the ongoing debate about the role of language in healthcare and its impact on patient outcomes. While some argue that inclusive language can promote empathy and respect, others believe that focusing on the language used by healthcare professionals may distract from more pressing concerns, such as access to quality care, resources, and medical treatments. Regardless of the criticism, the directive signals a broader movement within healthcare to reconsider how language shapes the patient-provider relationship and how it may influence public perceptions of certain conditions.

The NHS’s commitment to changing the way medical professionals communicate with patients reflects a broader global shift toward patient-centered care. This approach emphasizes the need for healthcare providers to consider not only the medical needs of individuals but also their emotional and psychological well-being. By focusing on the person rather than the condition, medical professionals can foster a more supportive and compassionate environment that empowers patients to take control of their health.

However, the success of such initiatives depends on the willingness of healthcare providers to embrace these changes and the ability of healthcare systems to implement practical solutions that address the root causes of conditions like obesity. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether the focus on inclusive language will lead to meaningful improvements in patient care or if it will be viewed as a superficial gesture in an already strained healthcare system.

As the UK moves forward with these changes in medical terminology, it is important to consider the perspectives of both patients and healthcare professionals. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a healthcare system that is inclusive, compassionate, and focused on improving the health and well-being of all individuals, regardless of their condition. Whether the focus is on language or healthcare solutions, the need for a more equitable and effective healthcare system remains paramount, and it is this broader objective that must guide future reforms and initiatives in the NHS.

In conclusion, NICE’s guidance on using inclusive language in healthcare represents a step toward creating a more sensitive and empathetic environment for patients. However, the controversy surrounding the move underscores the challenges of balancing language reform with the practical needs of healthcare systems. As the NHS continues to evolve, it will be crucial to ensure that language changes are accompanied by meaningful improvements in the care and treatment provided to patients. Whether through better access to healthcare, more resources for patients, or an improved focus on patient-centered care, the ultimate goal should always be to improve health outcomes and foster a more inclusive healthcare environment for everyone.