The Supreme Court of India said on Wednesday that media trial affects the administration of justice. The Police official have to decide which information should be given at which stage of investigation.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, along with Justices P S Narasimha and Manoj Mishra, stressed that media trial has a detrimental impact on the administration of justice. They stressed the need to sensitise police officials and determine the appropriate stage for disclosing probe details. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued a directive to the Union Ministry of Home Affairs, instructing them to develop a comprehensive manual on the nature of information disclosed in media briefings within three months. The court also instructed all Director Generals of Police (DGPs) to provide their recommendations on guidelines to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA).
Chief Justice Chandrachud underscored that information shared by the police during media briefings should be objective and not subjective, as it can influence the perception of the accused’s guilt. The bench acknowledged the significance of media trials, considering the interests of victims and the evidence collected, while emphasising the presumption of innocence for the accused until proven guilty. It was emphasised that media reports should not tarnish the reputation of the accused.
The top court also noted that biased reporting can generate public suspicion and, in some cases, involve minor victims. Thus, preserving the privacy of victims is crucial, while ensuring that the fundamental rights of both the accused and victims under Articles 19 and 21 are upheld.
The court highlighted the importance of propriety and proper procedures for police personnel during media briefings. It recognised that media reporting on criminal matters involves various aspects of public interest and touches upon the fundamental right to free speech and expression, both for the media’s right to convey information and for individuals’ rights.
