Legally Speaking

‘PROTECT HERITAGE OF LORD JAGANNATH’: PLEA BEFORE SUPREME COURT ALLEGES ILLEGAL EXCAVATION BY STATE OF ODISHA AT SHREE JAGANNATH TEMPLE

A petition has been filled before the Supreme Court to Protect the Heritage of Lord Jagannath. The petition alleged illegal excavation and construction work by the Odisha Government at Shree Jagannath temple excavators more than 30 Feet depth from the ground level, which is an integral part of the Temple exactly adjacent to the

The petitioner in the plea stated the State Government is trying to make some construction by excavating through heavy western side of Meghanad Pacheri. Furthermore, it is alleged before the Court that cracks have been found in the temple and in the walls of the temple.

It has been argued before the Court that Section 20A of AMASR Act is clear about the fact that there cannot be any construction within the 100-meter distance of the prohibited area.

The petitioner in the plea submitted that through Gazette Notification 3rd Feb 1975 and under Section 19(1) of the AMASR Act, the Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri, has been declared a monument of AMASR Act, 1958 and within the protected area no person including the owner occupier can construct any building.

The petitioner in the plea stated that the Government of Odisha is doing unauthorised construction work which is posing serious threat to the structure of the ancient temple of Mahaprabhu Shree Jagannath.

The petition has been filed to protect the heritage of Lord Shree Jagannath and in the interest of the general public challenging the illegal action of the Government of Odisha in not following the procedure laid down in relation to Shree Jagannath temple in the 1958 Act and the Ancient Monument & Archaeological Sites and Remains (amendment and validation) Act 2010, According to the Petitioner.

A Special Leave petition has been filled before the Supreme Court challenging Odisha High Court’s order of refusing to restrain the State from carrying out any excavation in and around Lord Jagannath Temple, Puri.

Advocate Gautam Das, has filled the present special leave petition and has argued that the State agencies have been working in gross violation of Section 20A of The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

The Bench comprising of Justice BR Gavai and Justice Hima Kohli observed and allowed the urgent listing of the case.

PRANSHI AGARWAL

Recent Posts

Saif Ali Khan Attacked: Actor Hospitalised After Knife Assault at Home

Actor Saif Ali Khan, stabbed by an intruder at home, is undergoing treatment in Mumbai.…

33 minutes ago

What Does The 3-Phase Agreement Of The Gaza Deal Include?

The landmark 3-phase Gaza deal brings hope for peace, featuring a ceasefire, hostage exchanges, and…

47 minutes ago

This Part Of The Dead Person’s Body Aghoris Like To Eat The Most, Why Do They Eat It?

Aghori sadhus follow mysterious and shocking rituals, including consuming remains from cremation grounds. Their unique…

1 hour ago

This City In India Is Home To The First Women-Only Nightclub, ‘No Men Allowed’ | WATCH

Bengaluru introduces "Miss and Mrs," India’s first women-only club, providing a safe, vibrant space with…

1 hour ago

Elon Musk, Lionel Messi Takes A Holy Dip At Mahakumbh? AI Brings The World To The Sangam | WATCH

An AI-created video featuring Elon Musk, Lionel Messi, and global icons taking a dip at…

2 hours ago

What Is ‘Tap, Hold And Load In 4K’?, X Users Are Going Wild For It

The "Tap, Hold, and Load in 4K" trend has taken over X, allowing users to…

2 hours ago