On Thursday, the nine-judge Bench of the Supreme Court overturned its 1989 Constitution Bench verdict, ruling that royalties payable on minerals do not constitute a tax.
In an 8:1 majority verdict, the apex court also determined that Parliament lacks the authority to impose taxes on mineral rights under the Constitution’s provisions. Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, leading the Bench, noted that Justice B V Nagarathna delivered the dissenting opinion.
The case addressed whether a ‘royalty’ qualifies as a tax and also examined whether a state could impose a tax on mineral mining or if its authority is constrained by Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDRA). This Section mandates that mining lease holders must pay royalties to the landowner to conduct mining activities.
Albanian PM Edi Rama celebrated Italian PM Giorgia Meloni's 48th birthday with a scarf gift,…
Saif Ali Khan was attacked in a burglary attempt, raising concerns over Mumbai's law and…
NASA's latest Instagram post, featuring a Sandhill Crane at Kennedy Space Center, highlights the rare…
The Australian Open is streaming animated versions of tennis matches, like Alexander Zverev's second-round match,…
The PCB is confident India’s captain Rohit Sharma will attend Champions Trophy 2025 events despite…
A viral video from @foodsafetywar claims unhygienic practices at Amritsar Haveli, Hyderabad, showing reused leftover…