India’s defense of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack by the military has shifted its strategy for countering terrorism. Operation Sindoor hit terror bases in Pakistan and PoK (Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir). This operation has grabbed the world’s attention, with a focus in the UK. The country’s former PM, Rishi Sunak, made an overwhelming declaration in favor of India’s right to protect itself. “India is right to hit terror infrastructure,” he said.
His declaration emphasizes India’s increased support at the international level for countering terrorism.
Rishi Sunak’s Backing of India’s Strike
Rishi Sunak strongly supported India’s military strike. In a tweet on X, Sunak highlighted, “No country should tolerate terrorist strikes from another nation’s territory.” He asserted that there should be no impunity for terrorists.
No nation should have to accept terrorist attacks being launched against it from land controlled by another country.
India is justified in striking terrorist infrastructure. There can be no impunity for terrorists.
— Rishi Sunak (@RishiSunak) May 7, 2025
His position is similar to the one that asserts there needs to be strong action taken to counter terrorism. For India, Sunak’s support solidifies its freedom to act against terrorism, even if it means taking military actions across borders.
UK’s Call for Restraint and Dialogue
Though Rishi Sunak backed the military attack, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy called on India and Pakistan to exercise restraint. Lammy appealed for direct talks in order to end the tensions and avoid further escalation. He cited threats of increased conflict among nuclear powers.
Lammy’s remarks are in line with the UK’s interest in ensuring regional stability. Being a country closely related to both India and Pakistan, the UK seeks to assist both nations in finding a diplomatic way out.
Impact of Operation Sindoor on Regional Stability
Operation Sindoor was a robust response to terror outfits such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), responsible for attacks on India, including the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. The operation struck at nine terror camps, destroying infrastructure associated with outfits that have long destabilized India. Prominent camps, such as Muridke, where Ajmal Kasab and David Headley received training, were targeted. India has sent out a message by doing this that it will no longer accept cross-border terrorism.
Although the strike was a success, the consequences have been worrying. Pakistan denounced the strikes and hit back with cross-border firing. The question is: will the tension reduce, or escalate?
India’s Efforts to Avoid Hurting Civilians
India was keen to promote civilian protection throughout Operation Sindoor. Wing Commander Vyomika Singh clarified the reasons behind selecting the targets: they were so chosen as not to result in civilian casualties.
This emphasis on precision indicates India’s resolve to carry out military operations with low collateral damage. The operation was successful in accomplishing its tasks and also met moral standards by avoiding harm to non-combatants.
New Approach to Counter-Terrorism
Operation Sindoor represents a change in India’s policy regarding counter-terrorism. It showcases India’s resolve to protect its sovereignty while dealing with terrorism firmly. With global support, particularly from the UK, India’s attitude towards combating cross-border terrorism has become firmer. Although there are voices in favor of talking and restraint, India’s intention is unequivocal.
Operation Sindoor’s success can be an indicator for similar actions against state-sponsored terrorism in the future. India’s move has reconfigured global diplomatic discourse regarding how to deal with terrorism.
