India

Delhi Court restrains media from publishing, disseminating content of chargesheet of Sharaddha walker case

Delhi’s Saket court on Monday passed an order on a plea moved by Delhi Police against a channel and other channels seeking an order restraining them from disseminating content of charge sheet including digital evidence in the Shraddha murder case stating that it is “not” a public document.

Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Rakesh Kumar Singh passed a restraining order against the channel and list the matter on April 17 for further hearing. The court said that a detailed hearing will be given to both the parties. Special public prosecutor (SPP) Amit Prasad said that the Delhi Police earlier approached the court on credible information that one of the media houses has accessed the audio-video evidence related to the Narco test and the Practo app.

This case is related to the alleged murder of Shraddha Walkar on May 18, 2022 by his live-in partner Aftab Amin Poonawala.
In light of the attorneys’ strike in lower courts, Delhi’s Saket Court deferred the hearing on charges against accused Aftab Poonawala in the Shraddha Walkar murder case on April 6.

Aftab was produced in the court physically. The next date for the hearing is April 14.
Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Manisha Khurana Kakkar after noting that the lawyers are not appearing due to absenteeism from work adjourned the matter.
The defence counsel is to argue on the point of charge.

SPP Amit Prasad had submitted that there is a clear judgement that the charge under section 201 of IPC can be framed against the person who destroys the evidence to shield the main offender as well against the person who committed the main offence.
On the earlier date, the counsel for accused Aftab had argued that the charges of murder and disappearance of evidence can’t be framed jointly. These charges can be framed alternatively.

Delhi police opposed the contention and sought time to place Judgements.
Advocate Akshay Bhandari had argued that either I (Aftab) can be charged with murder or for disappearing the evidence.

The accused cannot be charged for murder and disappearance of evidence under sections 302 and 201 of IPC together, the counsel argued. It can be framed alternatively.He argued that the accused can be charged with the offence of murder under 302 IPC or he can be framed for the offence of shielding the main offender under section 201 IPC.

Advocate Bhandari had argued Mere saying that I (Aftab) am guilty of murder is not sufficient. They have statements of eyewitnesses only. The Prosecution has to show the manner in which the crime was committed.
SPP Amit Prasad rebutted that the joint charges can be framed under section 201 for disappearing the evidence.

TDG Network

Recent Posts

Rare Melanistic Tiger Shot and Killed in Similipal Reserve, Only 20 Left in the Habitat

A melanistic Royal Bengal Tiger was poached in Similipal Tiger Reserve, one of the last…

34 minutes ago

Washington Post Faces Crisis: Journalists Seek Jeff Bezos’ Help

More than 400 Washington Post journalists have raised alarm about the paper's leadership and future.…

1 hour ago

Ultra-Processed Foods: The Hidden Culprit Behind Kids’ Misaligned Teeth

In recent years, growing concerns have emerged about the impact of modern diets on children’s…

1 hour ago

Gautam Gambhir Set for Support Staff Overhaul, New Batting Coach Expected After BGT Setback: Reportc

BCCI plans to overhaul the coaching staff, including a new batting coach, after India’s series…

1 hour ago

Cabinet Greenlights ₹3,985 Crore for Third Space Launch Pad at Sriharikota

The new Third Launch Pad (TLP) will be crucial in supporting the Next Generation Launch…

1 hour ago

Man Requests ChatGPT’s ‘Hottest Take,’ AI’s Reply Goes Viral

ChatGPT surprises a user with a thought-provoking analysis, revealing the true meaning behind "work smarter,…

1 hour ago