Bureaucrat’s Comments on Disability Quotas Create Stir

Sabharwal’s post led to a strong reaction from various quarters. Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi criticized her view as “pathetic and exclusionary,” suggesting that such opinions reflect a lack of understanding and privilege among bureaucrats. She emphasized that criticism should be directed at the misuse of reservations, not their existence, and argued that diversity and inclusion are crucial.

Senior Supreme Court Advocate Karuna Nandy also responded, expressing amazement at the “fundamental ignorance” of Sabharwal’s stance. She pointed out that many disabilities do not affect a person’s stamina or intelligence and that people with disabilities can make significant contributions if given a fair opportunity.

Arvind Gupta, a trustee of the National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People (NCPEDP), also weighed in. He highlighted the success stories of individuals with disabilities who have thrived in challenging environments when given the right support. He called for better education on disability issues and emphasized that people with disabilities can contribute meaningfully to society.

Background on the Controversy

The debate was fueled by the case of Puja Khedkar, a 2023-batch probationary IAS officer. She faced scrutiny over her eligibility for disability quotas and allegations about her qualifications. Her training has been suspended while a central panel investigates the validity of her selection and the application of disability and OBC criteria.

In summary, Smita Sabharwal’s comments have ignited a broader discussion on disability rights and quotas in civil services, challenging established views and sparking a call for greater inclusivity and understanding.