CBI shouldn’t be a victim of politics in Sushant case: Singhvi - The Daily Guardian
Connect with us


CBI shouldn’t be a victim of politics in Sushant case: Singhvi

Rishabh Gulati



In a wide-ranging interview on the order of the Supreme Court regarding investigation in the Sushant Singh Rajput case, noted lawyer and senior Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi opens up on a host of issues. Excerpts:

Q: The biggest concern was the CBI inquiry, the CBI inquiry is going ahead, but the court also said they haven’t found any fault with the government investigation or the police investigation in Maharashtra. What do you make of the judgement?

A: Look Rishabh, I think we are all bowing down to the judgement of the Supreme Court. It is the law of the land. Whatever we say and we are entitled to criticise it, analyse it, but with respect. Because one side has lost or rather two sides have lost and some sides have won; there is no doubt about it. Now there are three errors. One of the errors is what you have pointed out. And it is important to understand that one error, although I would like to speak about the other two also later on when you want me to. That is this, the judges exercised the extraordinary power under 142 of the Article of the Constitution to transfer a case as High Court judge or a Supreme Court judge can do. But, those judgements which allow him to transfer say it should be done in exceptional cases, rarest of rare, sparingly. Now, astonishingly, no exceptional, sparingly, rarest of rare circumstance is cited here. It is not rarest of rare or exceptional to see that you are a great actor or that your family is very disturbed in Patna or the two states are not agreeing. There has to be something there and there is nothing. And on top of that is the finding which you said and it’s in para 30, it is an earlier para that there is apparently nothing wrong with the Mumbai investigation. The second commonsensical thing, it hurts your common sense that where crime is local and if you accept this principle, forget this case, everything happens—suicide, murder, hitting, absconding, kidnapping in Maharashtra in Mumbai. On the basis of a race to file an FIR, if Kerala files an FIR first, it cannot give jurisdiction to Kerala. Here, the second big fallacy is saying that look Mumbai Police is investigating, they are doing a comprehensive job, but they are doing it as an investigation to find out whether there is sufficient material to lodge an FIR against some people. So, no FIR is lodged. Bihar has lodged it first, therefore Bihar gets jurisdiction. Now if this principle is accepted and you go away from Sushant Singh Rajput’s case, it means that a police force which is trying to be punctilious to find out whether to register an FIR, in what direction, in what way, just because some other state races to file an FIR that doesn’t take away the power of 175, 174 which the judge has sited against Maharashtra—to say, it’s only investigation. Even if it is only an investigation, everything occurred in Maharashtra.

Q: What do you make of the charge? Very strongly worded charges that have been put by the Bihar government making very strong accusations against the Maharashtra Police of not conducting a fair investigation.

A: Well, I think I should not bother as far as Bihar Police or other people are concerned. Everybody, as I said everybody, every commentator, every person on the street, every policeman, every lawyer, every media person has become an expert on this subject and we’ve been hearing about this. What matters is what the Supreme Court has held. What you’ve just said obviously the Supreme Court will not accept it because you rightly pointed out that there is nothing wrong with the police investigation. All kinds of inter-personal allegations were made. Suppose I wrongly quarantine you, suppose BMC wrongly quarantined you, suppose a law a rule was violated, it will not give Bihar jurisdiction because somebody has been wrongly quarantined. So, it is not a “tu-tu”, “mai-mai” game which creates a jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is not based on clutching at straws. Because on these straws, you will have the crime committed, as I said, in Kerala and some straw in Jammu and Kashmir will give the police jurisdiction.

Q: The investigation so far which has not been done by the CBI has been done by the ED; they haven’t found the money so far. When the CBI does come in, does this case then become a serious one because the charges being made are there are potentially politicians involved, and it is not about one death, it is about two deaths?

A: I would be very hesitant unlike a lot of the people you have been seeing since the last two weeks to get into this factual meritbased debate. I do believe that every person I meet is a judge, jury, executioner, prosecutor, persecutor, everything, all rolled into one. They are all giving verdicts. There is a very credible view which I can only say that there is absolutely nothing which connects any political class in Maharashtra to the case. But it is a happy hunting ground for the media. So, everyone can have an opinion; it’s a free country. Equally there is nothing today to show whether it is a suicide or a murder that the police would have decided, now the CBI will decide. One view is it’s a suicide; another view is it’s a murder.

 Q: One can sympathise an anguished family, but sir, it’s not just an anguished family, it’s the government of Bihar, its political leaders, it’s the Bihar police that’s not an anguished family. They are making very serious charges.

 A: I think there is no doubt in my mind that things have got bent, distorted, angularised because of politics. You see nobody is detracting from the deep anguish of the family in Bihar. There is no question of not commiserating with that very deep anguish. But that does not change jurisdiction. See, even you as a victim and I as a murderer cannot agree amongst each other or the perpetrator to create jurisdiction and choose our constituency. Suppose we both consent that I hit you and we both don’t like police X, we both consent to file a FIR in police Y, that’s not permissible. So now the court has decided and we are bound by it and ultimately the CBI, I hope, will put a quietus and not allow politics because the biggest danger is that the CBI should not be a victim of politics, also that’s my only concern.

Q: Dr Singhvi, the suspicion that many people are feeling and this has become a matter of public interest and in politics public interest matters, is that the very failure of Mumbai Police to file an FIR and investigate other aspects of this case is suspicious.

A: Mumbai Police I think if at all is guilty of over-meticulousness. I’ve seen the papers and that is why you have that sentence. Remember, a sealed cover was handed over to a judge which is a full case diary which you and I can’t see; I can see as the counsel, but normal people cannot see. The judge has seen it. And then he has recorded that sentence. Why? I do hold the Maharashtra police guilty of over-meticulousness, actually having seen the case diary because what they were doing was they were meticulously asking, they went to three psychologists, two doctors, five other people; then the allegations of Bollywood, so they went to too many people and they were in the process of making up their mind should there be an FIR, is it a foul play, is it a suicide, because a mere suicide without abetment would not be result in FIR. Now, they may have taken longer for that. I think that with greatest respect is an error of the judgement, to have treated that length of time and interpreted articles Sections 174 and 175 in a narrow way. So not filing an FIR will not give jurisdiction to Bihar who filed it first.

Q: What do we do when there is such mistrust now amongst the common public? Mistrust of Bollywood which would be Bollywood’s problem, but mistrust of government and police and investigating agencies?

A: a) Less sensationalism b) give it a quietus. The Supreme Court is, as they say, right because it is final, it need not be final, because it is right. Now we have a path, let CBI take it up, let CBI do a good job and to the extent possible, restore that trust. It is as simple as that. Here everybody keeps meddling; now tomorrow you might have people attacking the CBI without any evidence. The elections are around the corner, we know it, the CBI becomes a victim of political pressure; then it will spoil its copybook image completely and people will start asking what happened. So, I think everybody has to go by the law now. Now that the judgement has come, let us go by the law.

Q: Dr Singhvi, we know in criminal cases and if it boils down to other than money in the end somebody is dead, the evidence that is recorded in the first day or two, from the crime scene becomes so important and we’ve seen so many cases that evidence either gets compromised or the chain of custody gets compromised and then the case goes nowhere. Now, this also is causing a lot of distress to people being so long and that evidence could be compromised.

 A: Hopefully and happily mostly no, maybe little bit yes. Why I say it is fortunately, though an FIR is not filed, all the evidence is in control with the Mumbai police which they are now obliged to hand over to the CBI. So, whatever evidence is there in terms of statements, photographs, exhibits is there. It’ll only go to a different agency. Not, nonexistent. And it will not be extinguished because it is now in the police control or it’ll be in the CBI control. What is important, however, is that important questions are answered quickly by the CBI which the Mumbai police would have answered in a few days, I have no doubt. And one of them is obviously how and in what context could a family pull down a person hanging and put him down flat. It is just not done. You and I can’t just go and pull down a body and make it sleep comfortably in a suicide case even. So, these are questions that have to be gone into.

Q: Where does this go from here? Is there any legal ground because the Supreme Court judgement also says that FIR does get lodged in Maharashtra, the CBI can investigate that part of the case as well. So is there any legal ground for intervention by the Maharashtra government?

A: The Maharashtra government has full jurisdiction, option, consideration regarding a review petition. Today, I am not in a position in the immediate aftermath of the judgement to say if that’ll be taken, somebody will decide and certainly within the time given of 30 days, they can file a review petition. As the law stands today, clearly only the CBI alone can investigate. If material comes to Mumbai police, they will look into it and hand it over to the CBI, as of today.

Q: I know you can’t reveal details because it is privileged information, but you have done many cases like this, many high profile ones, have you found something troubling, something dubious in the investigation that as a counsel representing Maharashtra you were worried about?

 A: You can discount the fact that I’m a counsel, you can discount the fact that on some issues based on federal structure, our arguments have not been accepted, but I can tell you as objectively as possible and that is now a finding by the court that there is nothing deviant, startling, distorted or something unheard of which I have seen in a case diary or in the sequence of events. It is possible that somebody would have wrapped it up in two weeks; then people would have said it is too quick, too fast, too superficial. Somebody took longer, FIR was not filed. But even the court accepts that there is nothing wrong.

Q: Name dropping of politicians, of Aaditya Thackeray, is it all politics?

A: I have no doubt that this is the worst thing that can happen in any case. I have no hesitation in saying this kind of complete irresponsible politicking in a case is the worst thing. Right through the case, I never said a word of it. Media is largely also responsible. Everybody became a judge, jury, executioner, opinion maker. You are convicting every day, you are acquitting every day, is this the way? You say in jury trials people are more affected, what about this country? It is a free for all, it is jungle raj. Now forget this case, think about a normal case: You don’t protect the law, the law will not protect you next time. People are human beings, they get influenced and pressurised. You should never allow this and ultimately the responsibility is of the media. You can have a sober discussion, this is the law, it is a sub-judice matter and the judge should decide. I have no hesitation in saying that there were groups and classes who were out to make an opinion for the judge and virtually write a draft judgement for the judge in the media.

The Daily Guardian is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@thedailyguardian) and stay updated with the latest headlines.

For the latest news Download The Daily Guardian App.

News Plus


Aridaman Singh Rathore, Founder, Act Jaipur and Aanjneya Singh, Member, Act Jaipur joined NewsX’s special series, NewsX India A-list and spoke about how social media became a valuable tool in making their aim a fortunate reality.



Covid-19 was an unprecedented disaster that wreaked havoc on the world and is still at its prime momentum. Humanity is being tested daily, and some warriors are holding up its sanctity with valour and pride. NewsX’s special series, NewsX India A-list, aims at acknowledging such warriors. Aridaman Singh Rathore, Founder, Act Jaipur and Aanjneya Singh, Member, Act Jaipur, participated in the special series for their excellence in social work.

Introducing the concept behind this initiative and how it all came together, Aridaman said, “It was nothing but friend and family coming together to do their bit.” Driven by the feeling of helplessness and witnessing the Covid-19 pandemic exploding onto our country, he added, “We are focused on helping the helpless and feeding the needy. Even people with a good job profile who got laid off are suffering, and we came to their aid as well.”

Aanjneya Singh, who has been working in New York for six years, came to India for holidays and couldn’t go back due to the lockdown restrictions. Explaining how he came to be a part of this noble initiative, he said, “Actions speak louder than words. We had the resources and the network, so helping people in need was our responsibility.” Aanjneya also mentioned how donations from across Europe and New York, through his contacts, have been beneficial in propelling social aid.

Both the individuals spoke about how social media became a valuable tool in making their aim a fortunate reality. Aridaman connected with his cousins and friends over a WhatsApp group and started their page on Instagram. Social Media proved to be immensely helpful in propagating the idea further.

Throwing light on the reach and expansion of ‘Act’, Aridaman said, “Our initial goal was distributing 10,000 food packets. Today, we have distributed 23,791 meals, and are projecting close to 50,000 packets by mid-June.” Reiterating the importance of social media in times of the pandemic, Aridaman talked about the ease with which people with similar aim and equal drive connected with Act on Instagram. The platforms also facilitated their networking with several NGOs. One such NGO is ‘Raksha’. In collaboration with Raksha, Act Jaipur also fed stray animals and has expanded to distributing dry ration in slums.

“We wanted people to act out. We had had enough of just talking, it’s time to act now. We wanted people to realise the power of Social Media and reach out to the needy in such trying times,” said Aridaman while enlightening about the name of their initiative. He said that they want to do as much as they can in their limited capacity and are unwilling to stop until they achieve it. Aanjneya echoed Aridaman’s thought and said, “Doing something is always more beneficial than just speaking up.”

Humanity is facing a crisis, and initiatives like Act Jaipur gives people hope and a dose of positivity which is the need of the hour (after a dose of the vaccine). Ending the interview on a hopeful note, Aridaman said, “No amount is less, and no effort is lost.”

Continue Reading

News Plus




The worst ever pandemic, Covid-19 has affected the mankind world over, almost every country was caught unaware and unprepared. The gravity and severity of the pandemic were very much visible over time. It affected almost every aspect of human life including health, economy, development, and growth. It all came to a halt. The scientists, doctors, government, and the common man didn’t know what had hit them.

The worst situation the country ever faced after independence — the leadership and the common man didn’t know what had hit them and didn’t know how to deal with it and what to do. Everyone including scientists, doctors and researchers tried their level best to find a way out to deal with this dragon of the pandemic.

Though at the national level, Prime Minister Narendra Modi took the charge of the affairs and in Madhya Pradesh, Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan took the bull by the horns. So what made Madhya Pradesh different from other states in dealing with this pandemic is the Chief Minister taking the charge directly to control the scenario before it could get worse by taking adequate steps. This helped to not only control the pandemic but fight it and try to finish it. The fallout was much less than the anticipated one, damage to the economy and people were within control.

It was precisely because of the leadership of Shivraj Singh Chouhan, owing to his vast experience, know-how of the state, people, flora and fauna, as well as his vision and long term measures, nipped the problem in the bud itself and stopped it from blooming.

Whether it was managing the affairs at the state level, inter-state level, or national level, he was at his best, using all his resources in dealing with the pandemic.

Shivraj Singh Chouhan saw to it that the necessary medicines were made available besides providing oxygen and medical equipment, availability of beds to the needy ones on the one side and on the other side, making a team of dedicated officers to ensure the availability of necessary medicines that are not overpriced, keep a check on black marketing, hoarding etc. Also he ensured to check the supply of genuine medicines and lifesaving drugs, all these were made available timely to the patients at reasonable prices.

Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s way of dealing with the situation was lauded by the Prime Minister and other states were asked to replicate the Madhya Pradesh model especially in dealing with the pandemic in rural areas.

Whether it was dealing with the problem of migrant labourers, farmers, and agriculture-related issues, and getting the right prices to the farmers for their produce, the Chief Minister excelled in everything.

In this time of distress, his government made special policies for helping street vendors. Apart from this, taking the responsibility of the orphan children whose parents have died in the traumatic situation, Shivraj Singh Chouhan set an example, which was later on replicated by the Centre and other states also.

The Chief Minister, on regular basis, tried to get community feedback from various sources. He invited suggestions from every quarter of the society before framing any policy or taking any important decision. Involving public participation was the key to his success. On important issues, he didn’t shy away from taking advice from leaders of opposition and taking their help in case of need.

At the national level also, due to his vast experience and long stint, he was in regular touch with several Union Ministers in case of any help the state government needed be it the Union Railway Minister, for running Oxygen Express to various destinations of the state, or talking to Union Health Minister for the supply of necessary medicines, medical equipment, masks, oxygen concentrators etc. in time of need, or asking the Union Commerce and Industry Minister to open oxygen plants for various places in the state.

In case of severity, Shivraj Singh Chouhan didn’t even hitch in requesting the Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for timely release of necessary funds under various schemes to cope up with the dreaded situation. He didn’t shy away in asking for help from Chief Ministers of other states for helping the migrants from Madhya Pradesh stuck in their states. Meanwhile, Shivraj Singh Chouhan also helped the migrants from other states stuck in Madhya Pradesh. He took full care of them and ensured their safe return to their native places.

Shivraj Singh Chouhan is is the real son of the soil. In the state, he decentralised the powers to the ground level and made all district magistrates act and take quick decision, and in case of fatality, were answerable also.

Shivraj Singh Chouhan held regular meetings with the health and district officials and that helped him to get the right feedback and act accordingly as per need. It was this approach that all the districts of the states are out of the red zone and the state has begun with the unlocking process from 1 June onwards. It is his confidence, grit, and zeal to work for the people of the state to move forward with confidence and courage that worked wonders for Madhya Pradesh in fighting with Covid-19 pandemic.

The writer is Joint Director (P.R.), New Delhi, Government of Madhya Pradesh. 

Continue Reading

News Plus

The Greek connection of the pandemic and more

When the world is looking for politically-correct nomenclature and yearning for a medical utopia in which everyone is protected from the pandemic, ancient Greece is as good a place as any to start looking for beginnings of ideas and experiences that preoccupy us today.



One of the latest developments in the year and a half old pandemic has been nomenclatural. On 31 May 2021, the WHO rechristened Covid virus variants of interest after the first four Greek letters — alpha, beta, gamma, and delta. The Greek alphabet is the major contributor to English, but even in original, it occupies an important and euphonious place in domain-specific jargons, popping up in unlikeliest places. The Phi Beta Kappa Society, active since 1776, has 290 chapters in the US. Leaders of social groups are called alphas, betas, and omegas, in the order of dominance, based on research originally conducted on wolves in captivity. Software development goes through beta testing. We sleep wrapped up in alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and theta waves. Some unconscious patients end up in an alpha coma. Theta captures the decline in the value of a stock option over time. The Riemann Zeta function is used to study the properties of prime numbers. Lambda has come to stand for gay liberation, besides dozens of others meanings in as many disciplines. The examples can be multiplied almost without end. If Greek enrichment of jargon is diverse and wide-ranging, Greek contributions to ideas and culture are encyclopaedic. 

 To ancient Greeks, we also owe the idea of Polis. Poleis were nascent city-states established in ancient Greece over two millennia ago. The Covid-19 pandemic, already a year and a half old, has germinated a new aspiration among people across the world- to acquire as quickly as possible membership of a polis that might be called Immuno-polis. It is the virtual, global, and utopian community of those who have developed immunity to the SARS-CoV-2. Some have become its unwilling members by contracting the disease and developing antibodies against severe future attacks. Others are members by vaccination. The remainders, still a majority of people, await membership after getting their shots. Fears that they might be expelled from the protective borders of Immuno-polis by emerging strains have largely proved unfounded. Immunopolitans will continue to enjoy most of their privileges with the existing vaccines, with more on the way. From polis have arisen Metropolis, Cosmopolis, Necropolis, as well as the above-mentioned Immuno-polis. When herd immunity is achieved, benefits of this imaginary community would be available to all, even those who haven’t suffered from the disease or received a vaccine; we would all end up living in a Utopia.

Utopia, or an ideal community, is also a Greek idea, though morphed. In most intellectual histories, coinage of the word is attributed to Sir Thomas More (1474-1535) by whose work of the same name we know him best. However, he was only the efficient cause of neologism, as Aristotle might have put it. More seems to have got the word while translating the works of Greek satirist Lucian, whose True History, a compilation of events that never happened, is based in outopia, meaning ‘no place’. From this root, and ‘eutopia’, meaning a good place, More invented a pun, Utopia. Today we think of Utopia as goodness incarnate in a state. But More’s Utopia is dysfunctional, what we would now call a dystopia.

 This is not merely a linguistic quibble. The idea of a flawless state, and by implication, a flawed one, was Greek before Lucian got going. Plato, and Aristotle after him, assumed an idealised political entity of which all earthly republics and entities were imperfect forms and corruptions. The thread was picked up by Polybius and Cicero in ancient Rome after the disintegration of the Greek city-states. With the spread of Christianity, Augustine of Hippo and several centuries after him, St. Thomas Aquinas developed the idea in the context of a Christianising Western Europe and Italy. Plagues that wracked the medieval world contributed to a concrete concept of the opposite of Utopia. Ideal communities and their debased variants have been imagined, written about, and romanticised and demonised at all times and in all cultures. Dystopian writers today are respected distant descendants of Old Testament writers and Dante, whose descriptions of hell were alarming enough for his native Florence to drive him to seek the protection of Verona. Perhaps the greatest 20th-century creator of dystopias, Eric Arthur Blair, aka George Orwell, was at home in the Greek language. Writing a decade before Orwell, Aldous Huxley, in his Brave New World (1932), ordered his imaginary casteist society from alpha at the top to epsilon at the bottom. 

If renaming the variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus after letters of the Greek alphabet and ideal imaginary communities has ancient Greek roots, so is one of the earliest descriptions of epidemics and plagues. Hippocrates, the great physician of Greek Antiquity (460-370 BC), was perhaps the first to define endemics and epidemics. His pre-modern theory of humour continues to inform several enclaves of alternate medicine. Thucydides, the greatest among ancient historians and chronicler par excellence of The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC), describes the Athenian plague in the second year of the war, a contagion he contracted and survived. ‘At the beginning, the doctors were quite incapable of treating the disease because of their ignorance of the right methods. Mortality among the doctors was the highest of all, since they come more frequently in contact with the sick’, he writes. He goes on: ‘Some died in neglect, some despite every possible care being taken of them, what did good in some cases did harm in others. Those with naturally strong constitutions were no better able than the weak to resist the disease’. There were crises of faith, disorganised funerals, overwhelmed public facilities, changed attitude towards wealth and leisure and much else that sounds familiar in these times. What now and what next were as pressing questions then as they are now. When the world is looking for politically correct nomenclature and yearning for a medical utopia in which everyone is protected from the pandemic, ancient Greece is as good a place as any to start looking for beginnings of ideas and experiences that preoccupy us today. 

The writer is a physician and a civil servant in India.

Continue Reading





Haryana Urban Local Bodies Minister Anil Vij said that the state government has formulated a policy to give ownership rights to the occupants of the property of municipal bodies. A maximum rebate of up to 50% on the collector rate of the property concerned will be given to get the ownership of the occupied property. This policy will come into effect from 1 July. He said that the eligible occupant, who wants to take advantage of this policy, will have to apply online on the web portal to the concerned commissioner/executive officer/secretary of the concerned municipal body within a month. Vij informed that for the convenience of the occupants, a web portal is being designed which will be ready by 20 June as there is a possibility of large scale occupants to be covered under this policy.

He said that the Haryana government is working to give ownership to those occupants of the properties of the Urban Local Bodies Department, who own the property on rent, lease or license fee for over 20 years. These occupants will be given a maximum discount of 50% on the present collector rate for the deed of the property. Vij said that the occupants who have occupied such property for over 20 years but less than 25 years, they will have to pay 80% of the collector rate. Occupants who have occupied such property for over 25 years but less than 30 years, will have to pay 75% of the collector rate. Similarly, the occupants who have occupied such property for over 30 years but less than 35 years, will have to pay 70% of the collector rate and so on.

Continue Reading


Gujarat Assembly polls: Congress decides to take aggressive stance

Abhijit Bhatt



As soon as Covid-19 came under control in Gujarat, a series of political meetings started. After Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal visited Ahmedabad, BJP in-charge Bhupendra Yadav held a meeting with Ministers and MLAs. Now the Congress has also started churning. A lunch diplomacy meeting was held at the bungalow of Opposition Leader Paresh Dhanani Wednesday afternoon in which state president Amit Chavda, Shaktisinh Gohil, Hardik Patel, Arjun Modhwadia, Bharatsinh Solanki, Siddharth Patel, and other leaders were present. In the meeting, holding programs on the issue of Covid-19 and inflation as well as taking an aggressive stance towards the upcoming 2022 Assembly Elections were discussed. Apart from that, the racial equations on the election issue were also discussed.

For a long time now, there has been a heated debate in the Congress High Command over the new state president of Gujarat, the Opposition Leader in the Legislative Assembly and the Gujarat Congress in-charge. Incumbent state president Amit Chavda and Opposition Leader in the Legislative Assembly Paresh Dhanani resigned following the results of the local body elections but no new office bearers have been appointed yet. On the other hand, the death of Rajiv Satwan, in-charge of the Gujarat Congress, gave a major blow to the Congress in Gujarat. There is also talk of putting new faces in Gujarat to strengthen the party.

Gujarat Congress spokesperson Dr Manish Doshi said on Arvind Kejriwal’s allegations that the Delhi Chief Minister, who did not utter a word of consolation for the people of the country amid recession, inflation, and pandemic, was politicising the allegations against the Congress. It is the nature of the AAP to make such allegations. Thus the AAP is the B team of the BJP. He has come to Gujarat to benefit BJP. Kejriwal remained silent on the issue of farmers, education, and health. Congress has been constantly fighting the BJP. Congress does the politics of the masses.

In Rajasthan, resolving the revolt called by Sachin Pilot to accept his demand is the first priority for the Congress. In such circumstances, the High Command’s calculation to resolve the issue of Gujarat’s state in-charge, state president, and Opposition Leader in the Legislative Assembly by 11 June has turned upside down. Now political sources are expressing the possibility of a concrete solution in the next one or two weeks. Therefore, the Gujarat issue is not likely to be resolved in two days. It could still take at least a week. If the Rajasthan issue becomes more complicated, the Gujarat issue may take more time to resolve, the sources said.

Apart from Bhupendra Yadav, a meeting was held of party organisation office bearers, all MLAs, and MPs in the presence of Chief Minister Vijay Rupani, and State President C. R. Patil. The meeting will first give a glimpse of the government’s Covid and vaccination operations and the work done by the system during Cyclone.

Continue Reading





Srinagar: While the authorities have lifted some restrictions in Jammu and Kashmir in the recent past, the government has decided to extend the closure of all the educational institutions till 30 June.The government, in a fresh order, has decided to keep the schools, colleges, universities, technical education institutes, skill development institutes, and coaching centres closed for offline classes. According to the official communication to the media, “All schools, colleges, universities, technical education, skill development institutes, and coaching centers shall remain closed for in-person on-campus teaching”. “In view of safety and well-being of students due to Covid pandemic, all pending JKBOSE Examinations session 2020-21 (Regular/Private) for final exams of class XI and XII across JKUT for which examination/results are awaited, are cancelled,” the Lt. Governor’s office said. There has been a dip in the Covid positive cases in the entire Jammu and Kashmir due to the recent containment measures taken by the government that includes weekend curfew and night curfew. The government has accelerated the process of vaccination and in the past few days, a lot of vaccination camps were held even in Srinagar for the age group of 45 years and above so that the vaccination for the age group of 18 years to 45 years is also taken up at a massive level. LG Manoj Sinha recently asked his administration to get the 100% vaccination done for the age group of 45 years and above in Jammu and Kashmir by June-end. 

Continue Reading