ASSESSING SOM PRAKASH’S PERFORMANCE AS HOSHIARPUR MP

Hoshiarpur belongs to the Mahabharata period. It is said that 5000 years ago a ruler of Pandava dynasty had performed such a yajna here in which all snakes of the world were sacrificed. Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha seat of Punjab is important in many ways. BSP founder Kanshi Ram had also contested elections from here and […]

by TDG Network - February 28, 2024, 5:28 am

Hoshiarpur belongs to the Mahabharata period. It is said that 5000 years ago a ruler of Pandava dynasty had performed such a yajna here in which all snakes of the world were sacrificed.
Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha seat of Punjab is important in many ways. BSP founder Kanshi Ram had also contested elections from here and reached Parliament.
Presently Som Prakash of BJP is MP from here. He is Union Minister of State for Commerce and Industry in the Modi Cabinet. He took premature retirement from IAS to join BJP. He contested from Hoshiarpur seat in 2009 Lok Sabha elections on BJP ticket but lost. Subsequently, he contested Assembly elections from Phagwara seat in 2012 and emerged victorious. He again won from this seat in 2017.
A Dalit face in Doaba region of Punjab, Som Prakash has managed to establish his hold in the party.

It has not been easy for any political party to register victory here.
Every time the electors of this Lok Sabha seat have handed over mandate to different parties. Especially in the general elections from 1996 to 2014, the same party has never got a second chance. Earlier this seat was held by Congress.
But now BJP’s hold on this seat has strengthened.
The pace of development is very slow in Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha. Development has been a big issue for voters here. The victory and defeat of a candidate is decided on the basis of development. Here, for the second time, an MP can win only if the report card of his work is correct. Development is now visible little by little in all the assemblies. There are 9 assembly seats in this Lok Sabha, while there are about 16 lakh voters in Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha seat.

The voting pattern on this seat has been based on development but the game of caste card also runs rampant here.
Akali Dal, BJP, Congress and Aam Aadmi Party give importance to only those candidates who fit the caste spectrum.
Irrespective of which party the MP in Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha belongs to, the focus on development remains very less.

But now the voters here are also ahead in teaching a lesson to the political parties.
Nowadays the development of this area is getting better due to central schemes.
But there are many problems which need more attention.
The general election of 2024 is very special for Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha.
Before the elections, the people here must be evaluating the work of their MP.
India News is also conducting an accurate survey to test the MPs and is putting the public’s opinion before the country.
So let us see what is in the report card of BJP MP from Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha Som Prakash, pass or fail.

First let’s see MP’s performance in Parliament which included his attendance in Parliament, number of questions and MP fund expenditure and special contribution. MP Som Prakash’s attendance in Parliament is estimated to be around 54 percent. At the same time, it is estimated that about 53 percent of them are seen taking part in the parliamentary debates and questions asked and have also been giving suggestions for the development of the region and the country. If we talk about MP fund, then 82 percent of the expenditure is done and the special contribution in parliamentary proceedings is seen to be around 72 percent. On this basis, MP Som Prakash gets 0.65 marks out of one, i.e., 65 percent marks which is fantastically good.

Parliamentary performance matters very little at the time of elections. The real criterion is what the public thinks about their MP on the ground. In India News’ survey, we asked some questions to the people of Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha (See Box) and the people of this Lok Sabha seat have answered those questions with open hearts. The people of Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha answered our 6 questions without any hesitation. Most of the people believe that the work of the MP is not looking good in the area at present while some say that MP’s focus is on development first. It means clearly that the people of this Lok Sabha are not happy with the work of the MP. At the same time, the people of this Lok Sabha seat want to see their MP more active in the area because the people here have a lot of expectations from their MP. On the basis of these questions, the people of Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha are giving 3.29 marks out of 7 to their MP Som Prakash which is less than the average. So on the basis of the questions asked to the people of the ground, they are getting about 47 percent marks, i.e, 3.29 marks out of total seven marks.

Looking at Prakash’s performance on the ground, the people here are giving 0.25 marks out of 1 mark, that is, the MP is getting only 25 percent marks in his ground performance, which is very less.
You came to know about the MP’s performance on the ground and the MP’s score in India News survey, but today is the era of social media…on all the social media platforms, the same questions were asked to the people of Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha seat which it has been asked in the survey of India News. The results of our survey on social media are also being placed before you. In the social media survey, MPs are getting about 0.65 marks out of 1, which is It is excellent. About 65 percent people have a favorable opinion about the MP on social media.

On work done in Parliament like attendance in the House, number of questions, utilization of MP funds and special contribution, MP has got 0.65 marks out of 1. Ground performance has got 0.25 marks out of 1. In the social media survey, he has got 0.65 marks out of 1. In our ground survey, the MP is getting 3.29 marks out of 7. So, all four are combined then MP Som Prakash is getting 4.84 marks out of 10 which is less than 50 percent. That is why the people of Hoshiarpur Lok Sabha have written ‘failed’ in the report card of MP Som Prakash.