False allegations, as the name suggests, refer to accusations or claims against someone without any evidentiary value that are not true or In-accurate, which are intended to defame a person or cause agony.. These allegations can be made against individuals, organizations, or even events. False allegations can have serious consequences, including damage to one’s reputation, emotional distress, and legal implications. It is important to thoroughly investigate any claims before accepting them as true and to consider the potential impact of false allegations on all parties involved.
False accusations in court result in pointless, spiteful lawsuits that frequently waste the courts’ and the justice system’s valuable time while also tarnishing the reputation of the victim and creating a host of additional problems for them.
Every investigation into a criminal prosecution or accusations gave against a person in India is to be implemented as an assertion of truth only when it has been developed beyond plausible doubt that there is no an explanation for an adjudicator to believe that the allegation is untrue. This is because the rule of law in India provides that everyone shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty. However, there is no law in India that explicitly lays out sanctions for making false accusations against someone.
Numerous notable jurists and academics in India have argued that the Indian legal system needs to be amended to include a number of rules that would prevent the filing of false complaints and manufactured cases. The SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, marriage conflicts, dowry harassment, and rape instances typically involve the largest amount of false accusations.
Legal Action Against False Allegeation
In India, there are a number of legal defences available towards false accusations, including the following:
Seeking an Antipatory bail :- The victim of a false accusation in India should first apply for anticipatory bail from the closest court with the authority to do so in the event that a First Information Report (FIR) is filed against them in order to avoid being arrested due to a false accusation. Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits anticipatory bail to be issued prior to the making of an arrest. The victim benefits from seeking an anticipatory bail by being able to better prepare for his defence while also avoiding any arrest that might result in severe mental suffering and reputational damage.
Quashing Of FIR – By submitting an application according to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, wherein the court has the inherent requisit authority to accomplish the objectives of justice by issuing appropriate orders, a false accusation or complaint in the form of a FIR may be invalidated. However, there are a number of defences that the accused must establish, including that the act or omission of the accused that is the subject of the accusation does not constitute a crime, that the incident described in the complaint never happened, that the accusations are unfounded and were made out of personal animosity, etc.
Guidelines to Quash the F.I.R under section 482
In State of Haryana and Ors. v. Bhajan Lal and Ors. the Supreme Court observed, that though it may not be possible to lay down any precise, clearly defined and sufficiently channelized and inflexible guidelines or rigid formulae and to give an exhaustive list of myriad kinds of cases wherein such power should be exercised;
1.No Prima Facie Case: Where the allegations made in the first information report or the complaint, even if they are taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused.
2.Absence of Cognizable Offence: Where the allegations in the first information report and other materials, if any, accompanying the FIR do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officers Under Section 156(1) of the Code except under an order of a Magistrate within the purview of Section 155(2) of the Code.
3.Commission of Crime not disclosed: Where the uncontroverted allegations made in the FIR or complaint and the evidence collected in support of the same do not disclose the commission of any offence and make out a case against the accused.
4.Investigation begun without the order of Magistrate in Non-cognizable offence: Where, the allegations in the FIR do not constitute a cognizable offence but constitute only a non-cognizable offence, no investigation is permitted by a police officer without an order of a Magistrate as contemplated Under Section 155(2) of the Code.
5.Lack of Evidence: Where the allegations made in the FIR or complaint are so absurd and inherently improbable on the basis of which no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused.
6.Legally Barred: Where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the Code or the concerned Act (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the Code or the concerned Act, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party.
7. Vexatious Proceeding: Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with mala fide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the Accused and with a view to spite him due to private and personal grudge.
Provision Of the Indian Penal code :- According to Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code, anyone who falsely asserts in court information that they know to be untrue through dishonesty, fraud, or with the intent to annoy or harm another person will be punished with up to two years in prison and a fine. In the event that the court determines that the integrity and sanctity of the courts have been compromised, it is adequately empowered to punish those responsible using such laws. A person may also employ section 120B of the Indian Penal Code if they believe that a criminal conspiracy is being established against them in the future.
Provision of the Indian Evidence act :- Concrete evidence is a need in a court of law in order to support any claim. According to Section 193 of the Indian Evidence Act, anyone who knowingly presents false evidence at any stage of a legal proceeding or fabricates false evidence that may be used at any stage of a legal proceeding faces a term of up to seven years in prison as well as a fine. Second, according to Section 196 of the Evidence Act, anybody who presents false evidence as real in order to use it or attempt to use it would be penalised in the same way as if they had presented false evidence.
Provision of code of criminal procedure 1973:- Any person who has been the victim of a false accusation may seek redress in the legal system using several provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The same is supported by Section 250 of the Code, which stipulates that any acquitted person has the right to request reimbursement for anguish lacking an adequate legitimate justification, and the court must provide it. The court may even additionally and eventually condemn the perpetrator to simple being imprisoned
Compensation for accusation without reasonable cause:- Section 250(1) of the Cr.P.C lays down the provision that if a magistrate while acquitting the accused, thinks that there was no reasonable ground for making the accusation against the accused person’, he may order the person making such false accusation to pay compensation to the accused person. (Section 250 clause 2 also states that the amount of compensation shall not exceed the amount of fine the magistrate is empowered to impose).
Please read concluding on thedailyguardian.com